OK -- Back Talk

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, [3], 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

Subject: OK
Author: JeffF	[ Next Thread \| Previous Thread \| Next Message \| Previous Message ] Date Posted: 07:57:04 07/02/02 Tue In reply to: Kevin 's message, "Re: Read anything good lately?" on 07:50:31 07/02/02 Tue Now, you've convinced me to read it. The ending was the weakest part of the film. [ Next Thread \| Previous Thread \| Next Message \| Previous Message ]

Replies:

[> [> [> [> [> Subject: Re: OK
Author: Kevin [ Edit \| View ]	Date Posted: 07:55:36 07/03/02 Wed I don't want to say too much, of course, but the ending isn't that different. Is what you object to in the movie that the ending was too sudden/tacked on? Or that it was too melodramtic?

[> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: Re: OK
Author: JeffF [ Edit \| View ]	Date Posted: 09:06:55 07/03/02 Wed The suddeness is closer. The ending seemed too abrupt and to come out of nowhere. Even if it's close in the book, it may fill in a gap.