請解釋. -- SFXC forum

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, [10] ]

Subject:

請解釋.

Author:
ornaldo bloom

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 10:51:51 02/06/03 Thu
In reply to: 小友 's message, "我認為"阿拉伯人=恐怖分子=破壞者"" on 10:26:20 02/06/03 Thu

小友又真係講得頭頭是道,幾有道理.不過就作文而言,你篇文章好似離題喎.究竟,個topic同內容有咩關係呢?

有咩原因使你認為"阿拉伯人=恐怖分子=破壞者"呢?

"阿拉伯人=恐怖分子=破壞者"同"美國和伊斯蘭有深仇大恨"0既原因冇乜直接關係.

請解釋一下你認為"阿拉伯人=恐怖分子=破壞者"0既原因.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[> [> [> [> Subject: 阿拉伯人破壞和平

Author:
小友
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 09:28:05 02/07/03 Fri

雖然歷史上中東同歐洲人都有錯(十字軍東征和耶路撒冷主權問題),
但主要令西方同中東分化既原因:以色列和波斯灣戰爭,都係阿拉伯人搞事在先.
而恐怖主義和恐怖份子又源自阿拉伯人,中東各國又在背後支持恐怖份子,各點都令我覺對阿拉伯人非常反感.
而恐怖襲擊只會令世人對阿拉伯人更反感,又不對阿拉伯人有任何好處.
反以我認為阿拉伯人=破壞和平=恐怖份子
而我舉例子是要證明多是又阿拉伯人發起戰爭而破壞和平.

[> [> [> [> [> Subject: Re: 阿拉伯人破壞和平

Author:
ornaldo bloom
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 12:22:51 02/07/03 Fri

睇完你篇回應後,令我想起以前西方人做過0既一個研究,研究各色人種0既智商.結果係咁:0既美國,黃種人0既平均智商最高(大概高黑人十左右),白種人次之,黑人最低.於是種族主義者(主要白人)就大吹大擂.黑人係劣等0既,應該做奴隸,諸如此類.

但係只要你想一想,就會發現呢個研究係沒意義,因為每一個人種間0既智商差異遠大於人種與人種之間0既智商差異.換言之,係白人入面有好多人0既智商係低過大部份黑人,而黑人當中亦有好多人0既智商高過大部份白人.試問又如何得出黑人(智商上)係劣等0既結論?

番0黎你個例子,阿拉伯人當中無疑係有不良分子,而且做0左好多壞事,但絕大部分0既阿拉伯人都係善良.至少我所認識0既0個位伊朗朋友就絕對唔係壞人.佢地係虔誠0既信徒,跟從可蘭經,而可蘭經本身就係導人向善,所以我覺得你所指0既"阿拉伯人"根本就唔能夠代表全體阿拉伯人,更加唔可能得出阿拉伯人破壞和平呢個結論.

即使係咁,但係無可否認0既係個d衰阿拉伯人搞事在先,但係咁係咪代表要禍及其他無辜0既阿拉伯人呢?我地針對0既應該係罪惡,壞人,而唔係某一個種族!(對事不對人)