Re: 濟記精神? -- SFXC forum

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, [3], 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

Subject: Re: 濟記精神?

Author:
子榮以前同學

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 14:03:11 05/29/03 Thu
In reply to: 笨笨彬 's message, "Re: 濟記精神?" on 13:36:28 05/29/03 Thu

其實這件事. 如果唔係一個香港大學既學生報上報館,
這開頭跟本絕對不關科大, 聖芳濟的事.
何況這次報紙有寫明聖芳濟嗎? 難道各位還要希望報紙寫出他來自聖芳濟才開心??

>回應第三點, 就算大學生抄功課和每天吃東西一樣普遍,
>但如何証明這標題不恰當? 那裡不恰當?
公道自在人心.

>成績好固然令我校光榮, 但做錯野也會令我校蒙羞,
同意

>記得中五時, 我和一班同學因為要做壁報而借了課室,
>我們是有book房紙, 突然佢帶左一大群人黎話要開會,
>我地覺得我地淨係用後面課室, 所以就俾佢地用前面部份,
>當然佢o既態度已經非常唔好, 又話佢地開例會, 叫我地走,
>我地就問佢有無book房,佢就話佢地用開這課室,

如果有此事子榮同學真的不是. 但我記得學會regular meeting 係唔洗book房紙. 學生會應該唔比book 學會例會用的房. 如果是regular meeting. 我想這也可能是學生會一時疏忽.

>當時o既佢絕對係一個無禮貌o既人!! 當然現在o既佢可能改變了, 但從抄襲一事中, 我完全見唔到佢係一個踏實人!!

他以前的言行不好我同意, 但又未至於無禮貌, 同學你過份偏激了. 至於現在的他. 我相信他有抄功課. 如果因為一次半次而話他唔係一個踏實人. 我唔同意.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[> [> [> Subject: Re: 濟記精神?
Author: 笨笨彬 [ Edit \| View ]	Date Posted: 14:14:03 05/29/03 Thu 你搞咩呀~ 我地中五果時邊有學生會? >>公道自在人心. ??? 請問標題那一部份有問題?? 至於踏唔踏實, 我唔同你辨論, 大家價值觀唔同! 多口問句, 邊份報紙post左聖芳濟個名呢? 我只看了星島...

[> [> [> Subject: Re: 濟記精神?

Author:
Leung Kit Ho 7B17
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 14:48:40 05/29/03 Thu

我只回應一部份...因為我冇好仔細咁睇

>其實這件事. 如果唔係一個香港大學既學生報上報館,
>這開頭跟本絕對不關科大, 聖芳濟的事.
-冇錯...如果冇發生過呢件事O既,咁大家都唔駛煩la
但現在的確係有人報上報館,攪到咁大件事,我覺得已經與聖芳濟有關,你看看現在討論的氣氛多麼熾熱

>何況這次報紙有寫明聖芳濟嗎?
-'笨'同學只是提及現今的傳媒常將當事人的學校名稱一同寫出來,冇提及今次濟記又見報

>難道各位還要希望報紙寫出他來自聖芳濟才開心??
-唔係

我仲想再補充,呢件事就算其他人唔知道,我諗不消一會已可傳遍整個聖芳濟,一傳十,十傳百,點會對我地學校冇影響呢?

我睇過有關新聞,當事人以「part-time,課外活動」等作為一個迫不得以抄襲的「理由」,何理之有?