Re: 更同意7A人的分析 -- SFXC forum

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, [4], 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

Subject: Re: 更同意7A人的分析
Author: 不要成日罵政府	[ Next Thread \| Previous Thread \| Next Message \| Previous Message ] Date Posted: 22:14:59 04/30/03 Wed In reply to: Chinese 's message, "討論:還是香港的醫生比較好" on 12:30:54 04/30/03 Wed 當日仁濟也有醫護人員抗拒接收非典;人,是有許多共同點架. [ Next Thread \| Previous Thread \| Next Message \| Previous Message ]

Replies:

[> Subject: Re: 討論:還是香港的醫生比較好

Author:
7a6蔡進步
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 22:49:39 04/30/03 Wed

人只有對自己的行為負責,病了去醫亦是一種交易而已,醫生只能標示佢有專業技能與否,絕唔會因為佢有醫術就無啦啦背上大眾生命的包袱,大眾更不應因為自身的利益受損,就指責醫生,說醫生沒有道德,因為醫療過程是醫生利用自己的資源(感染的風險承受,精神,時間),給人醫病而換黎種所得(收入,成功感,幫了人的快感etc...)

鬧別人因為所得不能保賞所失而唔醫就是唔道德,就等於鬧別人唔送錢比你就是唔道德一樣,

天職是沒有的啦,千年前的君權神授就是有的,天生奴隸的"great norm"都有....天職一詞才是奴性的表現,人只對自己負責

醫生要醫人,是因為一紙合同,同樣,他們亦有權請辭

指責別人唔醫就係唔道德,其實只係一種 "當自己因買賣相方交易唔成功而受損失而發難的表現"

香港的醫生會因為看見別人的痛苦而不忍去做而稱之為善
1.是因為在自由選擇下
2.命題是"把自己的給別人就是善"

從這角度,香港的醫生的確比較"好",佢比jackso人梗話佢好

[> [> Subject: Re: 對進步兄講的有共鳴

Author:
不要成日罵
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 23:28:04 04/30/03 Wed

甲乙之間有一賣一買的合約關係,
甲所賣的比約定的更好更對乙有益,即甲願意犧牲更多去為乙服務,例如電視廣告某速遞公司那位女職員(好像叫啊"Jane"的)走幾條街追車送番d野比個客,果種不為回報ga額外服務精神是令人讚賞的,

但想想:若啊Jane的僱主要求個個員工都要做到她咁好,卻無額外酬勞給員工,這個僱主是否貪婪?

又以上的問題,把"僱主"兩字改為"市民",這些市民又算是貪婪嗎?