Re: 罵或批評政府、高官為何無效? -- SFXC forum

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, [6], 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

Subject: Re: 罵或批評政府、高官為何無效?

Author:
7A wolf

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 14:01:31 04/22/03 Tue
In reply to: 7A中史人 's message, "Re: 罵或批評政府、高官為何無效?" on 12:58:18 04/22/03 Tue

中史人,我只部份認同你的觀點。不錯,萬人上街,影響力當然最大,但翻看記錄,除八九六四外,香港有那次游行過百萬?為甚麼呢?你也讀ECON,你也知CHOICE有cost.情形就和你不敢堂上批評學校老師一樣,誰不知這樣最有效告訴老師你的不滿?但代價就……

另外,民主自由不一定最有效率,但效率又是否如斯重要?如果是,老董就不用開會吧?甚麼都是一言堂又是否最好?

此外,事實又是甚麼?假設你不知道公佬是本校童軍副旅長,而我知道,因此我說”事實”:”公佬是本校童軍副旅長”
而你根據你所知,說出事實”黃sir才是本校童軍副旅長”那麼,外人應信你的”事實”還是我的”事實”?　
而這只不過是其中的一句的一個爭論點,其它如是否本校？是否副旅長?等等我們都要不斷討論,查證才得知.簡單點說,現世的事實不過是部份已知的事實.

其實,批評可說只不過是一碗二十四味,有人認為喝它可健身,有人說煲二十四味費神失事,但只要碗二十四味不是毒藥,多喝一碗又何妨呢?當然,為了煲二十四味不烹飯便不對了!

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]