VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1[2]345678910 ]


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 14:09:22 07/10/08 Thu
Author: Heather
Subject: I know!! no way in hell would Blair let starr give her grandchild away, especially to Marcie. Man blair has lost her edge and her mind. Mother should not blindly support supid decision that their children make. Blair needs to start acting like an adult not not Starr's cheerleader!!! John is sucking the life out of Blair.
In reply to: Dandesun 's message, "Why does Blair need to be a nicer person? Why does she have to be nice at all? I thought her allure was being a bitch. Now we throw that out the window because John pats her on the head? God, this is like Blair/Sam all over again. So much for the She-Wolf!" on 13:31:58 07/10/08 Thu


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]


Replies:

[> [> [> [> I so disagree. John is Blair's sounding board and confidante, but in no way, John is no way driving Blair's actions at all. John and Blair are nothing like Sam and Blair not by a long shot. I really hope people are not expecting Blair to be psycho like Todd. I agree that Blair is being overly supportive of Starr, but I think that's a combination of Blair always being deprived of unconditional support&love along with Blair's guilt of staying with Todd for so long which it was NOT in her children's best interests. -- sparklebarbie, 15:52:36 07/10/08 Thu


[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> Not in her children's best interests... until Blair and Todd reunite. It'll happen at some point and no, it's not about T&B being DESTINY or crap like, it's just a given. And then all of her 'Todd's so bad for the children... I feel so bad for sticking with him for so long...' goes right out the window. -- Dandesun, 16:12:15 07/10/08 Thu


[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> [> I really hope that Blair will be done with Todd for a long while. The thought of Blair going back to Todd anytime in the foreseenable future makes me sick. In my opinion, Todd has become the new Max who is a drug for Blair despite the lows. Right now, Blair is seeing things clearly and she was 100% right today that sticking with todd as long as she did, subjected her children to a bunch of pain and confusion. John tells Blair that she is a good mom, but she said today she does not feel like she is. Blair feels like she has failed her children especially Starr. -- sparklebarbie, 17:47:41 07/10/08 Thu


[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> If wishes were horses... I rather wish Blair wouldn't get involved with John. You wish Blair and Todd will never be together again. I'm willing to bet we BOTH lose. -- Dandesun, 18:56:57 07/10/08 Thu


[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> [> Remember when Blair told Todd (in Chicago) that she wouldn't want any other man to be the father of her children? Wonder how long till she's saying that again? With the predictable cycle of storyline, it shouldn't be too long. -- Cathy, 18:06:21 07/10/08 Thu


[ Edit | View ]


[> [> [> [> John sucks the life out of every character he touches. The only other character I like him with is (ironically enough) Todd. JoTo is actually humorous. Otherwise, I cannot stand John period. -- Cathy, 17:47:20 07/10/08 Thu


[ Edit | View ]


[> [> [> [> I agree that Blair would never want her grandchild with Marcie. Not after what Marcie did with Sam. I just don't buy that she's ok with it. I don't think she is, but is afraid to say otherwise, because deep down, she agrees with Todd that the child should not go to the McBains. She looked like she was going to cry yesterday when she learned about it. -- Cathy, 17:55:33 07/10/08 Thu


[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> I did not get the impression that Blair was about to cry yesterday. I thought she looked stunned that Starr made that kind of decision without talking to her first. I do not think Blair agrees with anything Todd says. Todd and Blair seem to be on two completely different wavelengths right now. I really don't think deep down Blair is against what Starr is doing, but I do think Blair wishes Starr would talk to her before making these big decisions. Its very hurtful for Blair to feel shut out by Starr. -- sparklebarbie, 18:21:58 07/10/08 Thu


[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> [> I guess we disagree lucy. I definitely thought Blair looked about to cry when she was standing behind Todd and he was asking Starr how she could consider giving the child away to a woman who kidnapped Sam. Blair even admitted to John that she said she'd help Marcie in part to get back at Todd. Todd rejected Blair the other day and she's still angry about it. I know this story so well I could recite it with my eyes closed. I don't think it will be too long before Blair articulates to someone that she doesn't want the baby w/Marcie -- Cathy, 18:29:30 07/10/08 Thu


[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> Wait...what Todd rejected Blair? clearly I must have missed something. please fill me in. thanks. -- sparklebarbie, 19:02:47 07/10/08 Thu


[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> [> I rather think she IS against what Starr is doing. At the very least she's not completely sold on the idea and is only going along with it because she promised Starr to stand by her no matter what. I agree with others, Blair's become a yes-man to Starr... which really isn't that different from being the Stepford Wife to Todd during the strike. Blair hasn't actually sat down to talk any of this through with Starr, mainly because Starr won't TELL her anything and Blair doesn't seem to give a damn about that. This is progress? If you say so. -- Dandesun, 18:55:48 07/10/08 Thu


[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> this is why i think blair being a yes-man to starr is different than being a stepford wife to todd. being a yes-man is blair's way of doing everything for her child, but being a stepford wife was blair's way of putting her relationship with todd above her own children. i always thought cause of her horrid childhood, blair would always go above and beyond for her children, and give them the unconditional love and support she never got which is what I think is driving her now that and the guilt of failing her kids. -- sparklebarbie, 19:11:52 07/10/08 Thu


[ Edit | View ]




[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT-11
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.