Fun question! -- La Femme Nikita Fan Fiction Message Board

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, [3], 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: Tuesday, June 13, 05:45:54pm
Author: Nell
Subject: Fun question!
In reply to: Amanda 's message, "Some "newbie" questions." on Tuesday, June 13, 02:17:57am

For me, it was Nikita herself who kept me turning back, week after week.

If I could change one thing? I would go back to the ending of S2/beginning of S3 and refocus the story telling on the moral ambiguities of first worlders fighting terrorism in the third world, rather than - as the show did - turning inward on the lives of the Section inmates. So, for starters - I would dump the whole "Married Michael with kid" plot.

Nell

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

GREAT question! -- ~delle, Tuesday, June 13, 05:55:43pm
- The MMWK development (r) -- Nell, Wednesday, June 14, 06:45:11am
  - When did we start agreeing so much? (r) -- JayBee, Wednesday, June 14, 07:33:05am
    - Oh. We couldn't have lasted this long without some fundemental agreement...! (r) -- Nell, Wednesday, June 14, 08:21:48am
      - Re: Oh. We couldn't have lasted this long without some fundemental agreement...! (r) -- Amanda, Wednesday, June 14, 11:16:45am
        The Perils of Pauline was (r) -- Nell, Wednesday, June 14, 11:50:23am
        Re: The Perils of Pauline was (r) -- Amanda, Wednesday, June 14, 01:04:43pm
      - But it's so weird agreeing with you! (r) -- JayBee, Wednesday, June 14, 11:21:26am
        Well - we don't agree about Nikita's capabilities! (r) -- Nell, Wednesday, June 14, 11:53:38am
        What a relief! ;-) -- JayBee, Wednesday, June 14, 12:01:40pm
        I agree...(r) -- Swatkat, Wednesday, June 14, 11:52:58pm
Re: Fun question! -- JayBee, Tuesday, June 13, 06:22:38pm