Date Posted:Saturday, January 14, 05:40:35pm Author: Nell Subject: Heh - actually, yes. They have. In reply to:
Shanola
's message, "Coming late to this, and you may not even see it, but" on Saturday, January 14, 04:40:30pm
The second marriage is null as soon as the first is discovered to still be in existence.
At least, this is true technically.
Part of the challenge of the idea of adultery - the LFN context in particular - is this very issue.
Is it a letter of the law idea that has no meaning in their world?
Or is adultery - the concept of violating a presumption of sexual fidelty - still an issue regardless of the legal standing of marriage?
In Paul's case - I would say, personally, once in Section - no, no adultery where Corrine was concerned.... it's the relationships between Corrine and Stephen's mother and Paul that I've always been curious about with regard to any concept of adultery! LOL!
