VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 12[3]4 ]


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 20:51:56 12/01/03 Mon
Author: Mike Cypull
Subject: As Predicted November 18th

Hey everyone,

The prophecy is fulfilled: On November 18th I posted a message that said I bought The Two Towers and then I predicted that, because I used the words "Lord of the Rings", the ad banners would change to accomodate our "interests" and sure enough, today when I loaded up the forum, there it was.

Oh yeah, I'm so totally awesome.

Mike.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]


Replies:

[> Though I want to share in your excitement... -- Tim, 21:28:17 12/01/03 Mon

Hey Mike,
It's not like the ad banners switched the next day. I mean...if you had typed the same message 2 months ago, it still would have been true. Sorry Mike, but your egotistical logic is flawed. I'm so totally awesome. Not you. Good try though. :p
TK


[ Edit | View ]


[> [> Your Jealousy knows no bounds Timothy -- Mike Cypull, 12:50:37 12/02/03 Tue

To those of you unbelievers:

I merely stated that it would change, not when the change would occur.

Mike.


[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> To merely state a change... -- TK, 17:29:04 12/02/03 Tue

Mike,
To propose such a change is nothing to be proud about. That claim is nothing profound but a simple statement of the inevitable. Why not make the claim that the sun will rise tomorrow? It's about as obvious.
Truth be told Mike, I'm not jealous of you. Personally I would be ashamed to take such pride over such a simple observation. But you keep making those claims, you might say I'm jealous in that while you have found your niche in life (pointing out the obvious), I have yet to found that life fulfilling niche.
Ciao.
TK


[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> I will fulfill "my niche" again right now... -- Mike Cypull, 20:38:25 12/02/03 Tue

Since you have defined my purpose and place in life as "one who points out the obvious" and are yet un-aware of your own place I will provide you my services. Tim, your place is obviously that of the annoyed spectator, the child who is always nagging and trying to steal other people's wind. You have demonstrated such behaviors in your most recent post, slandering my abilities to observe.

Mike.


[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> Slandering your abilities?!??!?!?! -- TK, 20:49:23 12/02/03 Tue

Slandering not the correct word. Sorry Mike. Slander is something that is spoken, and spoken falsely. Your observations are correct (though insignificant) and I have pointed that out...I did no such "Slandering." IF, and I stress IF, if had written a falsity...that is what we could call "libel." Look it up "Oh Observer." But maybe the word "libel" isn't as obvious as the Sun, or upcoming Lord of the Rings advertisments/banners. You should get a dictionary down in that niche of yours.
Now quit your foolishless.
TK


[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> [> Tim... cut me down for a technicality?? -- Mike, 20:54:44 12/02/03 Tue

Wow, even I'm taken back by that... You know, at least I can spell "foolishness".. I guess I'll just point that out right now. But really.. You know what I was saying... You were just looking for another way to put me down. I hope you feel better, because I sure don't. It's just getting to be beyond annoying.

Mike.


[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> You can spell Foolishness. (nice observation) -- TK, 21:00:31 12/02/03 Tue

So...I misspelled foolishness huh? Quite the observation Mike. Good to know you haven't left your niche of holiness. I'm not looking for ways to put you down Mike, I'm simply trying to become like you. I'm stating the obvious...such is the difference between slander and libel. I do feel better thank you very much. AND, if you think MY ACTIONS ARE ANNOYING!!!! I know a few people who are more than a little pissed at your ACTIONS! Doing things like...say....SPENDING ALL YOUR FREAKING TIME WITH KAYLA! Jeez...friends come home from NE and you just put them in the back seat with everything else that doesn't have to do with Kayla....grow up Mike.
TK


[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Tim... I am without words -- Mike, 21:13:39 12/02/03 Tue

Tim Tim Tim Tim,

You fail to realize that Kayla is actually nice to me and doesn't put me down like you do. I know it's hard for you to think like that, you know, about other people's feelings (and don't try to turn this around on me, I take them into consideration) but try to imagine it from my point of view. I mean, here I am trying to relate to my "good friends" in idel conversation, you know, just saying casually "our ad-bannery will be changing soon" and you just go off... Ugh.. It gets really old, Tim, and frankly, I'm glad we didn't see each other over break.

Mike.


[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Mike, I am not without words, but... -- TK, 21:23:22 12/02/03 Tue

Hey Mike,
You mentioned that you were without words, yet that is your longest reply yet. (please don't lie to me)
I have a lot of words, but out of respect for your easy cop out "don't try to turn this around on me" I will leave you with one last observation (since you seem to enjoy those) Here I go.

Kayla must put up with a lot of crap.

TK


[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Screw you Tim. -- Mike, 21:31:45 12/02/03 Tue

You just don't get it Tim. I'm seriously sick of it, I try to maybe get to the root of the problem and you just give me another chop. Well, I'm done, and this conversation is over.

Mike.


[ Edit | View ]


[> Re: As Predicted November 18th -- Mike Rehani, 23:12:42 12/02/03 Tue

You two are hilarious! Keep this up. It's entertaining.


[ Edit | View ]



[> Re: As Predicted November 18th -- Kayla Halde, 12:51:07 12/08/03 Mon

HEY! i resent the fact that you used my name on the internet. my name has been slandered! i feel so ashamed, what am i to you? an all consuming mike entity? i had nothing to do with that! well...reguardless! anyway, sorry for "crunchin." but mike said i could go here, and i'm bored. if its all right that i crunch, i shall do so. crunch crunch crunch. crunchety crunch crunch. crunchety.
tricks are for kids.
~The slandered soul~


[ Edit | View ]


[> [> Uggh. -- TK, 17:57:54 12/08/03 Mon

Dude, it's crunkin, not crunchin, and by the way, you're not allowed to say that on here.
TK

P.S. View Miah's post for further "no-crunkin" history.


[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> Re: Uggh. -- Kayla, 09:04:38 12/09/03 Tue

Tim, its weird that you would get so defensive about the usage of the word "Crunkin'" if 1) i didnt use the word, and 2)it isnt allowed to be used on the Forum, and i abided by that rule, whether it was accidental or not is beside the point. So you should be glad i used crunchin' instead. and MIKE doesnt need to defend me. i am capable of doing so myself. it was a mistake, i admit but,there wasnt a need for such a reply.
~kayla~


[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> Re: Uggh. -- TK, 12:17:29 12/09/03 Tue

Kayla, Kayla, Kayla,
While I appreciate your willingness to uphold such standards as set forth by the board of this forum committee, I must say I'm disappointed to see you use the word "Cr*nkin" even though you had previous "abided by the rule." Whatever though, a little hypocrisy is expected at times.
Ciao.


[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> Re: Uggh. -- Kayla, 12:54:29 12/09/03 Tue

Tim, you should know that bleeping the word out, is stupid.
and i was merely using it as an example. it wasn't directed twords any one action or person. i thought an explanation was in order because of your rude statement. but, a little rudeness is expected

ciao

~kayla~


[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> Of course... -- TK, 16:04:08 12/09/03 Tue

Umm...for lack of words I'll finish this with.
You spelled "towards" wrong.
TK


[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> Re: Uggh. -- Kayla, 13:37:41 12/11/03 Thu

TIM!!!!! you need to stop that. if you refuse to continue a conversation, then just say so or dont say anything. pointing out the faults of others, especially misspellings of any kind is especially annoying. "I think we're all pretty sick of it by now."


[ Edit | View ]






Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.