VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, [2], 3, 4 ]
Subject: Re: The Laws response part two


Author:
Abel
 		[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 23:23:56 11/15/04 Mon
In reply to: silverfox 's message, "Re: The Laws response part two" on 22:53:11 11/15/04 Mon
 "I don't think nesecerally spirituals laws gain anymore meaning by being in a different religion"....you just destroyed your point about the buddhists and other religions and made my point clearer.
"Now i think the pagans here are wiser than you in the fact that they aren't to stubborn to realize that spiritual laws keep the same meaning and beauty just cause they are applied by a different religion" why do you insist on saying that I do not appreciate other religions? i mean they have a nice way of putting it, yay! now i'm wise!
I'm not gonna waste my time though, all religion lacks Jesus Christ."If they don't believe in jesus it seems liek you want to discredit their spiritual laws as not being as good as chirsanity" Actually it's not like, that's exactly what i'm trying to say, they lack Christ. i could careless if they lack "christianity" but if they lack Christ that's another story. "as trusting a book" You're one to speak, don't you base you wiccan beliefs on what others have writen and said??? "i don't think most people be ready for it." you're finally right about something, but only because Jesus said it first.." But the Comforter, which is the Holy Ghost, whom the Father will send in my name, he shall teach you all things, and bring to your remembrance, whatever I have said unto you" John 14:26. "governned by spiritual laws" So who do ya s'pposse set these laws in place?
"Honestly i question how spiritual anyone is that can bad mouth ghandi and buddha for thatm atter just calling them fools" If I would bad mouth Ghandi or Buddha by calling them fools, wouldn't you assume that there are reasons as to why I would do such a thing?
"As for god's word being toyed with by man why not, man was given free will so if what was in it was valuable and got lost by translation it be are fault"... you said it.
"But if we have free will then obivoually that would include the free will to transfer and translate the word as we thought god saw fit" And you said my WHOLE point once again! AMAZING! I really need not say more for this one, i'll leave you with what you see god fit as, maybe now that He's in your little box you can go on a nd play with your religions and excuse whatever and call that wise and the rest fools.
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:
Subject Author Date
Re: The Laws response part twosilverfox23:41:29 11/15/04 Mon

Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.