VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, [4] ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 15:51:34 03/09/03 Sun
Author: Lee Bishop
Subject: Re: tactical sign 505th PIR
In reply to: Sam Kimpton 's message, "Re: tactical sign 505th PIR" on 15:50:11 03/09/03 Sun

Sam,
Good memory!
Mine is actually marked SV-7. I've also seen Jeeps marked with just a number for the vehicle #.
You're right that the line companies didn't have Jeeps at the front, at least not right away.
I looked through my copy of "Jeep Jeep Jeep," and there isn't a single company-marked Jeep in there.

Actually, with all the airborne-marked Jeeps out there today, there's more than would've been used by the Airborne during the entire war!
Lee

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.