Create a New Forum Admin Login Member Login Contribute to Voyager Search VoyForums Help Desk VoyForums Exchange VoyForums Directory/Categories VoyForums Homepage VoyForums News FAQ - Frequently Asked Questions

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, [3], 4 ]

Subject: Re: Election soapbox Author: Dave P. [ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ] Date Posted: 21:04:50 04/13/05 Wed In reply to: Dave P. 's message, "Election soapbox" on 20:56:41 04/13/05 Wed >I see that Michael Jackson, in the witness box a >couple of weeks ago, swore on the Popes life that he >never touched those kids....................... > >Q. What's small, brown and is found in babies nappies? >A. Michael Jackson's hand. > >Q. How do the kids that visit M.J. Neverland know >when it's time to go home? >A. When the big hand is on the little one! > >OK..........OK enough of the crap jokes! Anybody fed >up with the election yet? It seems to have been going >on for months! I am not decided yet about where to >place my vote but it WILL NOT be for the Labour Party. > I can't stand that cretin Bliar and his, wide mouthed >frog, other half. It may all be academic anyway if >the following article is true! > >"Anybody who still doubts that the constituency >boundaries are heavily weighted in Labour's favour >should click on the following link, which represents >the result if Labour get 50% of the vote and the >Conservatives get 50%, with other parties getting none: > > > >Labour win 380 seats, Conservative 248 - i.e. a Labour >majority of 114 would result! > >Also interesting is to swap the Con & Lab votes from >last time around whilst leaving the others unchanged: > > > >A result which led to a landslide majority of 154 for >Labour would result in a majority of just 12 for the >Conservatives. > >Add some industrial-scale vote-rigging into the >proceedings, and it looks rather like the system is >biased towards a certain party..............." > >Food for thought there I think? And we think we live >in a democracy? It will take a huge bloody turn out >and swing from Labour to change this Government and, >somehow, I don't see it happening. Time to head for >the hills? Enough with the soap box, a last joke to >lighten the mood................ > >A fellow came up to me this morning and asked me if >there was a B & Q in Woodgate (where I live) and I >told him "No mate, it's W_O_O_D_G_A_T_E!" > >I'll get me >coat................................................ edited to fix links, sorry about repetition. [ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Subject Author Date Re: Election soapbox Dave P. 21:08:42 04/13/05 Wed