VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1234567[8]910 ]


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 20:20:23 03/14/03 Fri
Author: J.P. Gibb
Subject: Because I haven't posted anything recently (And it's kinda interesting)...

Saw this on the local paper's site, thought I'd share it.

A study at the University of Pittsburgh my alma mater, btw indicates spell-check software may level the playing field between people with differing levels of language skills,
Down with the bourgeois elitists! Power to the proletariat writers! (/Marx) hampering the work of writers and editors who place too much trust in the software.

Not to mention creating MSTer fodder.

In the study, 33 undergraduate students were asked to proofread a one-page business letter - half of them using Microsoft Word with its squiggly red and green lines underlining potential errors.

The grammar check is completly useless, I don't know who's grammar it's supposed to to be, but it's not what I learned.

The other half did it the old-fashioned way, using only their heads.

Ho boy, that had to be interesting, college students w/o spell check...

Without grammar or spelling software, students with higher SAT verbal scores made, on average, five errors, compared with 12.3 errors for students with lower scores.

'Kay, if you have a higher SAT verbal score, wouldn't you naturaly be better at writing than someone with a low score?

For instance, the letter included a passage that said, "Michael Bales would be the best candidate. Bales has proven himself in similar rolls."

The software - picking up on the last "s" in "Bales" - suggested changing the verb from "has" to "have," as if it were a plural. Meanwhile, the spell-check ignored "rolls," which should have been "roles."


We know some writers famous for not noticing things like that, ne?

So, complete waste of time, or was this interesting after all?

http://customwire.ap.org/dynamic/stories/S/SPELL_CHECKED?SITE=PAPIT&SECTION=HOME

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]


Replies:



Post a message:
This forum requires an account to post.
[ Create Account ]
[ Login ]
[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT-5
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.