Re: Seeking Public Opinion....on the topic of Height -- Miss Chinese Melbourne

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: [1] ]

Subject:

Re: Seeking Public Opinion....on the topic of Height

Author:
spongebob squarepants

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 19/10/04 5:35pm
Author Host/IP: 210.50.40.238
In reply to: A.K.E.F.B. (A Keen Eye For Beauty) 's message, "Seeking Public Opinion....on the topic of Height" on 15/10/03 5:06pm

ur another freakin idiot!?!?! discriminating people who are short...wat the hell did u expect this comp to be all caucasians! asians have a rep for being the shortest people in the world n u want a comp of 12 hot girls who r all 170+! ur such a dreamer! even if we could find those type of people they would be all tall lanky freaks...mayb much like urself
>For people out there, do you reckon it is a
>pre-requisite that our winner should have a decent
>height (e.g. 170cm+)? I believe so anyway. Of course
>looks, figure, brain and so on are all important
>judging criteria, however many of these criteria are
>very subjective, leading to controversial decisions.
>Take looks for example, we know beauty is in the eye
>of beholder (as the Poll on this website so
>overwhelmingly demonstrates). Hence we need something
>concrete, something that can be measured objectively.
>Height is one such criterion that comes to mind. So
>are some other "measurements" if you know what I
>mean...hehe...Anyway, If we look at the mother of all
>beauty pageants: Miss Universe, we would have observed
>that all previous winners of Miss universe are never
>short little cuties, they are all tall bombshells :)

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]