VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 12345678[9]10 ]


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 11:21:47 04/17/04 Sat
Author: 旺財
Subject: 是否技術擊倒見仁見智, 但以勝負距離而言, 沒有足夠理據証明飛駿寶可以多讓世紀之駒十磅. 簡如這場馬只得世紀之駒及飛駿寶跑, 只贏一頸位要加十分的話評磅員必定捱轟.
In reply to: kk 's message, "其實我個觀點好簡單,純以姿態和難度去評論:如世紀之駒跑入第二之態值加十分,無理由飛駿寶唔值加二十分以上!原因好清楚及簡單,就是一匹三歲馬負著131磅跑,竟可造出55.2超快時間,技術擊倒一匹只負119磅(過兩磅)並已跑到盡到不能再盡的世紀之駒!這也是小弟所講的:只厚待頭馬,不厚待入位馬而已." on 01:19:18 04/16/04 Fri


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]


Replies:




Forum timezone: GMT+8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.