VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 12[3] ]


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 00:44:19 06/08/03 Sun
Author: 勞斯丹頓
Subject: Re: 沉默只會讓民主沉淪
In reply to: brilliant_boy 's message, "Re: 沉默只會讓民主沉淪" on 07:41:37 06/07/03 Sat

民主並不是經濟發展成熟後,便能夠由此產生出來,小弟認為絕對不是;香港、新加坡和歐美各地唐人街的經濟條件,對民主的發展應該能夠配合起來的,但現實是各地富裕的華人社會都幾乎自動放棄民主的發展;為甚麼世界上很多地方的人民需要民主的誕生?因為要利用民主來平衡皇帝、獨裁者或資本家們,在對人身、思想和經濟上的操控權,平和點說就是平衡,激烈點說就是角力。
我們不能夠單憑經濟狀況,便斷定民主應該在甚麼時間發展出哪個階段;我們應該明白沒有經過相對均衡化的社會,會有哪些壞處(民主的首要功能在於防止害處),例如,今天的美國裡面的整體利益是不是被石油大亨、軍火商或猶太人等等上流階層凌駕?
民主政治是要產生相對均衡的政治權力,使到社會可以處於相對均衡的狀況下發展,如果認同社會需要相對均衡這個理念,哪麼經濟發展的階段便不應等同民主發展的階段了。

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]


Replies:



Post a message:
This forum requires an account to post.
[ Create Account ]
[ Login ]
[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT+7
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.