Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your
contribution is not tax-deductible.)
PayPal Acct:
Feedback:
Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):
| [ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, [4] ] |
Subject: WE ARE NOT MENTALLY UNSTABLE!!! |
|
|
Author: DARRYL LILLY |
[
Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message
]
Date Posted: 09:13:53 03/29/06 Wed WHY IS THE LOCAL CLAIMING THAT ARBITRATION IS A DANGEROUS MOVE? I'D RATHER TAKE A GAMBLE AND HOPE FOR THE BEST AS OPPOSED TO REVOTING ON A CONTRACT THAT WE ALREADY KNOW IS BAD. MY MAIN GRIPE WITH THE PREVIOUS PROPOSAL IS THAT IT WAS NOT AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY CONTRACT, EXAMPLE- WHY SHOULD I GIVE A HECK ABOUT THE 25/55 REFUND WHEN I AM NOT ENTITLED TO ONE? AND ON THE MATTER OF THE 1.5% HEALTH CONTRIBUTION. IT SHOULD REFLECT A STANDARD AMOUNT. WHY SHOULD A TRAIN OPERATOR PAY MORE THAN A TRAFFIC CHECKER SIMPLY BECAUSE WE EARN MORE? AND WHOA TO THOSE WHO WORK EXCESSIVE OVER TIME. STOP MAKING IT SEEM THAT MTA EMPLOYEES ARE TOO DUMB TO REALIZE WHAT'S GOOD AND WHAT'S BAD. WE CAN ACTUALLY WIN IN ARBITRATION. STOP TRYING TO SHOVE THAT CONTRACT, WHICH SHOULD HAVE BEEN PRINTED ON TOILET PAPER, DOWN OUR THROATS. I AM OFFENDED BY THESE DISRESPECTFUL TACTICS. SEE MY COMMENTARY IN THE MAR 21, 2006 EDITION OF THE NEW YORK DAILY NEWS, PAGE 32. [ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ] |
|
Forum timezone: GMT-8 VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB: Before posting please read our privacy policy. VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems. Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved. |