VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Wednesday, May 13, 6:26:43 [ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: [1], 2, 3, 4 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 19/12/04 2:18
Author: 璟
Subject: Re: "王甫"問題
In reply to: P 's message, "Re: "王甫"問題" on 18/12/04 11:25

這不是全篇不全篇的問題，
要全篇都讀古音固然是刻舟求劍的做法。

比方說「死」字本來是「史」音，很多字如「看」字在詩中往往要讀平聲，以正古音來押韻。但這是否代表任何時候都要讀古音呢，不是的。

古音和今音絕不是對立的，今音由古音而來，語音的爭議也源於此。
到此其實沒有一個絕對的準則去決定甚麼是正音，因為語言是活的，用於日常生活的。

正如我一開始說的，正音與否當看準則為何。既然明白了甫字是「普」「府」兩讀 (請注意，我是說唐代未有「府」的讀音，並非說「府」字讀音不對) 那問題反而成了於姓氏中甫字的發音是甚麼了。
在我而言，我覺得兩者都可以，兩者都是正讀。

但如果以普通話的發音來決定廣州話的正音，那是我無論如何難以接受的論調

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT+8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.