VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Wednesday, May 13, 1:09:24Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1[2]34 ]


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 11/02/04 8:50
Author: 黎健
Subject: 情人節的浪費與殺虐動物

關小姐今天的專欄(2月11日)牽涉兩個話題, 都值得進一步討論.

在商業推銷的影響下, 情人節已經成為了香港社會的大浪費. 當中鮮花更是最奢華短命少社會利益的消費. 鄭經翰早前便已在其電台節目中呼籲將錢捐助公益, 但恐怕還是聽者藐藐.

禽流感SARS等症候恐慌令人類大量屠殺禽獸, 為合理化這些惡行, 語言上也要配合. 除了 '銷毀' 之外, 近日又有 '產品' 之說, 總之試圖將罪行輕化.

素食問題我近日亦每想及, 但想到當年馬克吐溫嘲笑素食主義者說食肉者反殺生的論調, 詰問難道植物就沒有生命? 而且人類為改變植物來適合自己食用 -- 最近的例子當然是DNA改造 -- 已經進行了多少的惡行? 只是猶如已被大量毀壞的海底珊瑚, 傳媒少報導或用美化語言, 大多數人避不願知而已.

希望更多人關心這些問題, 一起為世界尋得救他救己之道.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]


Replies:



[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT+8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.