VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Sunday, April 28, 20:56:15 [ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, [3], 4 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 5/11/03 19:53
Author: Anger
Subject: Re: 作品和現實
In reply to: Agnes 's message, "Re: 作品和現實" on 5/11/03 9:52

"I do agree that not all literatures is a projection/reflection of the author’s experience or life."我不反對你的意見，所以有些作品是作家本人的Reflection，但亦有些是作家本人的Projection。但Vincent 一直的討論是指著Patsy的作品來討論。如果他用Projection來形容瓊瑤的作品，我未必會反對，但用來形容Patsy的作品，我就不會認同。
你說"What you written is only a very small part of psychology "我不會反對，即使是a very small part of psychology，亦不表示有錯。
「we can only say that the writing reflects the society at time, the way of living, its culture and the ideas the author wants to put forward in his/her writing, not what they experienced」以上這段話是我認同的，正因如此，我才說不適宜用projection一詞來形容。

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT+8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.