VoyForums

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, [6], 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: Mon, Aug 27, 07:57:09am CST
Author: Randy
Author Host/IP: 74-38-1-153.dsl1.pco.ca.frontiernet.net / 74.38.1.153
Subject: Re: SURVEY
In reply to: Bill Boester 's message, "Re: SURVEY" on Sun, Aug 26, 07:57:44pm CST

>>>>>>>>well it looks like the Survey was more than what
>>>we
>>>>>>>>were told. look's like a vote to me. I think it
>>>was
>>>>>>>>posted as such also. I REALLY DONT LIKE TO BE
>>TOLD
>>>>A
>>>>>>>>LIE!!!!!
>>>>>>>Randy you should bring your survey to the world
>>>hunt
>>>>>I
>>>>>>>think since you turned this into a vote the Board
>>>of
>>>>>>>directors should be able to look them over.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Apparently some of you are still under the false
>>>>>>assumption that the association has control of the
>>>>>>registry office. It does not. The survey was our
>>>>>>attempt to determine how the majority of people
>>feel
>>>>>>about the isuues we put in it. We will try to
>>follow
>>>>>>majority opinion, but there is nothing that
>>>requireas
>>>>>>us to.
>>>>>>The setting of the standards is under belongs to
>>the
>>>>>>registration office and not the association. That
>>>has
>>>>>>been true since before Richard McDuffie left North
>>>>>>Carolina, because, the registration office is an
>>>>>>incorporated business. We asked for input and we
>>>paid
>>>>>>for it. We will direct the registration office
>>>>>>according to the input from the survey. I have
>>>>>>wondered for some time how many of the members who
>>>>>>cannot come to the annual meeting actually feel.
>>>>Every
>>>>>>member should have the same input. We did our best
>>>to
>>>>>>do just that. A survey was sent to all members on
>>>the
>>>>>>membership list just prior to the mailing. I know
>>>>>>that we have gained some since then.
>>>>>>Randy
>>>>>I think if you do not want to show the servey
>>results
>>>>>to the board of directors you have something to
>>>>>hide.Your right you own the registry you can
>>probably
>>>>>do what you want but I would think it would be just
>>>>>plain bad buisness to not work along with the board
>>>of
>>>>>directors and the association and just do what ever
>>>>>you want.I for one really dont care if you do go
>>>broke
>>>>>cause I dont plan on registering any more dogs with
>>>>>you unless you change your attitude.One more thing
>>>the
>>>>>dogs I registered with you this past spring was a
>>>>>waste of money and I would like a refund because I
>>am
>>>>>an unsatisfied customer!
>>>>
>>>>Bill, Quite a few of the association members have
>not
>>>>been registering dogs with this registry, especially
>>>>since UKC came into the picture. It's a free country
>>>>and everybody can choose to register with us or not.
>>>>The dogs will speak for themselves. There are scores
>>>>od hunters who are hunting Leopard packs who have
>>>>never joined the association and never transferred a
>>>>dog. I would like to see some of those join us and
>>>>promote my favorite breed. As for my having
>something
>>>>to hide...I haven't said I wouldn't show the surveys
>>>>to the board. Why the accusation?
>>>>Randy
>>>The accusation comes because you give me the
>>>impression you dont care what anyone thinks your
>going
>>>to do what you want anyhow.You constantly keep
>>>reminding that you have the control of the
>>>registry.You still havent said if you were going to
>>>share the results.I would think your buisness would
>>>only benifit from a better relationship with more of
>>>the members.
>>
>>Bill,
>>There was only one issue about which I was not willing
>>to change. I stated what that was right off when I
>>bought the registry. I changed it at the outset. That
>>was that white on the back would not be allowed. That
>>isn't up for a change. That is my decision. That is
>>the only one.
>>
>>If I were doing what you say the % of white would be
>>much lower. I accepted the survey results of 1/3. That
>>is true of all the others as well.
>>Randy
>Randy I am just asking a ? here.Do you think just
>because a leopard has some white on there back it has
>walker blood bred into them.

No it isn't just Walker that can put white on the back. It can be double-merle (which is a completely different thing) or any of the breeds that have the "piebald" genes i.e. July, Goodman, Hudspeth, Trumbo, etc. Of course Wakers have the piebald gene.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.