VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, [6], 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: Mon, Aug 27, 09:36:46am CST
Author: Bill Boester
Author Host/IP: 74-46-204-222.dr01.jrvl.il.frontiernet.net / 74.46.204.222
Subject: Re: SURVEY
In reply to: Randy 's message, "Re: SURVEY" on Mon, Aug 27, 07:57:09am CST

>>>>>>>>>well it looks like the Survey was more than
>what
>>>>we
>>>>>>>>>were told. look's like a vote to me. I think it
>>>>was
>>>>>>>>>posted as such also. I REALLY DONT LIKE TO BE
>>>TOLD
>>>>>A
>>>>>>>>>LIE!!!!!
>>>>>>>>Randy you should bring your survey to the world
>>>>hunt
>>>>>>I
>>>>>>>>think since you turned this into a vote the
>Board
>>>>of
>>>>>>>>directors should be able to look them over.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Apparently some of you are still under the false
>>>>>>>assumption that the association has control of
>the
>>>>>>>registry office. It does not. The survey was our
>>>>>>>attempt to determine how the majority of people
>>>feel
>>>>>>>about the isuues we put in it. We will try to
>>>follow
>>>>>>>majority opinion, but there is nothing that
>>>>requireas
>>>>>>>us to.
>>>>>>>The setting of the standards is under belongs to
>>>the
>>>>>>>registration office and not the association. That
>>>>has
>>>>>>>been true since before Richard McDuffie left
>North
>>>>>>>Carolina, because, the registration office is an
>>>>>>>incorporated business. We asked for input and we
>>>>paid
>>>>>>>for it. We will direct the registration office
>>>>>>>according to the input from the survey. I have
>>>>>>>wondered for some time how many of the members
>who
>>>>>>>cannot come to the annual meeting actually feel.
>>>>>Every
>>>>>>>member should have the same input. We did our
>best
>>>>to
>>>>>>>do just that. A survey was sent to all members on
>>>>the
>>>>>>>membership list just prior to the mailing. I
>know
>>>>>>>that we have gained some since then.
>>>>>>>Randy
>>>>>>I think if you do not want to show the servey
>>>results
>>>>>>to the board of directors you have something to
>>>>>>hide.Your right you own the registry you can
>>>probably
>>>>>>do what you want but I would think it would be
>just
>>>>>>plain bad buisness to not work along with the
>board
>>>>of
>>>>>>directors and the association and just do what
>ever
>>>>>>you want.I for one really dont care if you do go
>>>>broke
>>>>>>cause I dont plan on registering any more dogs
>with
>>>>>>you unless you change your attitude.One more thing
>>>>the
>>>>>>dogs I registered with you this past spring was a
>>>>>>waste of money and I would like a refund because I
>>>am
>>>>>>an unsatisfied customer!
>>>>>
>>>>>Bill, Quite a few of the association members have
>>not
>>>>>been registering dogs with this registry,
>especially
>>>>>since UKC came into the picture. It's a free
>country
>>>>>and everybody can choose to register with us or
>not.
>>>>>The dogs will speak for themselves. There are
>scores
>>>>>od hunters who are hunting Leopard packs who have
>>>>>never joined the association and never transferred
>a
>>>>>dog. I would like to see some of those join us and
>>>>>promote my favorite breed. As for my having
>>something
>>>>>to hide...I haven't said I wouldn't show the
>surveys
>>>>>to the board. Why the accusation?
>>>>>Randy
>>>>The accusation comes because you give me the
>>>>impression you dont care what anyone thinks your
>>going
>>>>to do what you want anyhow.You constantly keep
>>>>reminding that you have the control of the
>>>>registry.You still havent said if you were going to
>>>>share the results.I would think your buisness would
>>>>only benifit from a better relationship with more of
>>>>the members.
>>>
>>>Bill,
>>>There was only one issue about which I was not
>willing
>>>to change. I stated what that was right off when I
>>>bought the registry. I changed it at the outset. That
>>>was that white on the back would not be allowed. That
>>>isn't up for a change. That is my decision. That is
>>>the only one.
>>>
>>>If I were doing what you say the % of white would be
>>>much lower. I accepted the survey results of 1/3.
>That
>>>is true of all the others as well.
>>>Randy
>>Randy I am just asking a ? here.Do you think just
>>because a leopard has some white on there back it has
>>walker blood bred into them.
>
>No it isn't just Walker that can put white on the
>back. It can be double-merle (which is a completely
>different thing) or any of the breeds that have the
>"piebald" genes i.e. July, Goodman, Hudspeth, Trumbo,
>etc. Of course Wakers have the piebald gene.
if the parents are 100% full leopard then why does it matter were the white is

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.