VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Wed, May 06 2026, 15:07:15Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1234567[8]910 ]
Subject: "留根"不能留!


Author:

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 00:55:28 10/10/03 Fri

哩個中國人改埋個西人名,真係無謂!
佢其實連狗都不如,只可以是一堆狗屎!
成日只懂廢up,乜春都9講一餐,無厘啦謂!
最Q煩係凡事只睇表面,佢隻屎眼睇到既一切都認為係岩,根本唔去深入了解!
尤其係對學生,佢既教學態度真係不敢恭維,一味淨係識煲煙!
平時上堂走左去就唔在講,就連去旅行時都係班學生面前食煙,你話死無?!
同學們,又係時候起革命喇,用行動杜絕哩條根,使佢收口又收工啦!!

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:
[> Subject: Re: 你係唔係神經錯亂呀~~~波


Author:
丁蟹
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 01:43:19 10/10/03 Fri

你用唔同名留言不特止,仲話完呢個話果個.無的放矢.連人家食煙都可以無限上綱.你有唔開心發洩無所謂.但唔好響處亂吠一通.
你父母是否土共或紅衛兵出身,殘留了鬥爭,批鬥的劣質老毛主席基因給你這種蟻民.令你在今天狂性大發,見人就鬥呀.

有本事就響濟記發起文化大革命,制定具體周詳的戰略,打擊走資派,外歸理念教學派,上位邀功派........唔好響處齊講,做個無膽的紅衛兵.

在亂鬥老師時切記: 人善人欺天不欺,人惡人怕天不怕.
[> [> Subject: Re: 你係唔係神經錯亂呀~~~波


Author:
波波波
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 02:13:04 10/10/03 Fri

波黎波去咪又係我~!
我係用唔同既名呀,但我都係用同一個人既身份喎,咁又有問題咩?!
我事實上只係不滿哩兩個老師咋喎!
哩度係俾人發表意見架喎,咁我講我主觀既野應該無錯呀呵?!
如果你認為有問題咁請你列明哩度應該點樣先可以"正確咁發表意見"喇!!

**我上黎既目的唔係要同你d無關重要既人鬥嘴喎,我係要同哩度既用客就住一d題目討論一d既問題同收集各人發表既一d意見咋喎!
[> [> [> Subject: Re: 你係唔係神經錯亂呀~~~波


Author:

[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 02:19:07 10/10/03 Fri

補充:

仲有我講既野都係有事實根據架喎!
又唔係生安白做!
所有既事實我只不過係將佢記錄底同係度講出黎咋喎!
涉及私穩嗎?無喎!
我犯了法,違了規嗎?都無喎!
請不要侵犯我在合法合情合理情況下的自由!!
[> [> [> Subject: 去報導一件事實的觀念不應是這樣


Author:
7B24
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 22:48:26 10/10/03 Fri

問題在於傳媒都好中意所有既事實將佢記錄底同講出黎
涉及私穩嗎? 絕對有
而有必要這樣寫嗎? 絕對冇
[> [> [> Subject: Re: 你係唔係神經錯亂呀~~~波


Author:
???
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 21:00:41 10/15/03 Wed

>**我上黎既目的唔係要同你d無關重要既人鬥嘴喎,我係要同哩?>蚻J用客就住一d題目討論一d既問題同收集各人發表既一d意見?>Q喎!

同學,我唔係話要同你嘈架,但我有一樣o野要同你講,就算你要點樣批評老師,你都唔可以玩人身攻擊,同埋你就算冇人身攻擊,我都覺得你唔應該亂咁批判老師!
[> Subject: Mr.Lai is a good teacher


Author:
7A 28 2003
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 04:12:43 10/10/03 Fri

Mr.Lai has profounded knowledge in chinese language and literatures.
More importantly, he inspires students. He uses Qs to help students develop their own thinking ,their own views..
Try to identify and appreciate the good points of a person ~~
[> [> Subject: Re: 阿波,放過根叔啦


Author:
老兵
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 08:27:06 10/10/03 Fri

點講根叔都係好老師兼唔會失信於人啦.其實有一點大家要留意的是看一個老師的能力不是睇短期的教學,而是要看長期的表現例如公開試成績等.讀書其實是很靠自己,唔應該把主要的成敗責任推到老師身上.根叔以前教過我預科中文,當年佢重訓練我們個人思維和增進個人的common sense和考試訓練(他可是考試局的權威評圈官).結果,我們的班的中文文化科合格率是100%,屬三班之首.有人話當年的文科班
中文文化科合格率也是100%......之不過卻不屬實.

此外大家要認識一件事,~~~~~~食煙唔係好,但係食煙唔代表一個人的人格差或唔係好人.其實大家將來出來工作有很多同事也會食煙.
若對食煙的人存有偏見,很易影響人際關係.提醒各同學,Temptations隨處也有,我在大學所見不少原本來自女校的所謂乖乖女,到最後也因種種理由變成煙不離手.而從事工程的行業更是煙民集中地.到你食煙時,又希不希望人家歧視你呢.
做人睇人唔可以單看表面,否則你會很吃虧.
[> Subject: Re: "留根"不能留!


Author:
口口
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 08:05:54 10/10/03 Fri

喂~人地老豆老母點出身好似唔係好關你事,你唔好持住自己識好多野係度9問,9up好喎
[> Subject: Re: "留根"不能留!


Author:
成吉思汗
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 17:32:10 10/10/03 Fri

請定義何謂西人名
[> Subject: Re: "留根"不能留!


Author:
香港好
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 17:37:10 10/10/03 Fri

ballball:
有一個職業o岩你做--四五行動成員,長毛二號!
乜都罵!
[> Subject: Re:


Author:
唔順眼
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 22:55:51 10/10/03 Fri

邊個o係度自稱F.7A 28 號呀!?
好醒呀??? 簡直「項很實溝」
[> [> Subject: Re:


Author:
.
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 19:36:37 10/12/03 Sun

邊個o係度自稱唔順眼呀!?
好醒呀??? 簡直「走狗」
[> [> [> Subject: 係唔很順眼,吹咩?


Author:
你就走狗
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 23:37:53 10/12/03 Sun

我唔順眼係因為7A 根本冇 28 號,你唔知咁多咪搭嗲,唔好o係度放屁!
[> [> [> [> Subject: 我夠係唔很順眼,吹咩?


Author:
.
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 17:18:56 10/13/03 Mon

我話你係因為你講d野好唔順耳,你唔知咁多咪搭嗲,唔好o係度放屁!
[> [> [> [> [> Subject: Re: 我夠係唔很順眼,吹咩?


Author:
....
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 00:03:20 10/14/03 Tue

乜哩個網有聲架?
[> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: Re: 我夠係唔很順眼,吹咩?


Author:
.
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 18:16:34 10/14/03 Tue

乜你唔知o里個世界有比喻架咩?
[> [> [> [> Subject: 誰說沒有


Author:

[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 17:27:28 10/13/03 Mon

(7A28) YAM CHU HO (7A28) 任儲豪
佢今年七月畢業(2003)
[> [> [> [> [> Subject: 誰說今年有!?


Author:
=.="
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 23:57:51 10/13/03 Mon

人地話今年,你就講舊年,你唔好講埋前年、大前年、大大前年、......?你咁醒就講埋下年邊個 7A 28
[> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: 2003是舊年嗎?


Author:
haha
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 18:14:12 10/14/03 Tue

?????
[> Subject: Re: "留根"不能留!


Author:
4b36
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 23:20:37 10/10/03 Fri

老實講....根叔今年教我中文....佢份人就真係有d怪,但係佢學識淵博!而且你地話佢成日講廢話,唔教書
但以我自己黎睇就係,佢係有講一d唔關課文既事,但係有時候佢所講既野的的確確令我自己有所得著
而當佢一入正題教書果時,就會將書文精華講出....而唔係好似以往其他老師咁連一d好細微既野都講埋
所以可能有d同學唔慣啦~但係我自己就係GET到佢講乜既
問心,係唔係要一個老師將所有答案都up晒出黎就叫做好?係唔係講晒tips俾大家聽就叫好?我地首要要學既係中文,而唔係學點去考試....當然,我唔係話叫大家忽略考試既技巧,但係,如果連一點中文既知識都冇既話?任你考試技巧再好又如何?又,即使掌握到考試技巧,考得好又如何?學根叔話齋...考完試之後米又係俾番晒老師....
[> Subject: Re: "留根"不能留!


Author:

[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 23:24:18 10/10/03 Fri

你改咩名都冇用啦,睇你寫d野就知你係乜水啦。你被根叔串,你都經常串根叔啦。
[> [> Subject: Re: "留根"不能留!


Author:
4b36
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 00:01:50 10/11/03 Sat

>你改咩名都冇用啦,睇你寫d野就知你係乜水啦。你被根叔串,
>你都經常串根叔啦。
下...我幾時有寸根叔??
[> [> [> Subject: Re: "留根"不能留!


Author:

[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 13:13:08 10/11/03 Sat

>>你改咩名都冇用啦,睇你寫d野就知你係乜水啦。你被根叔串?>A
>>你都經常串根叔啦。
>下...我幾時有寸根叔??
下...=.="
我唔係話你喎,我話波咋嘛.....
[> [> [> [> Subject: Re: "留根"不能留!


Author:
7A
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 12:59:00 10/12/03 Sun

>>>你改咩名都冇用啦,睇你寫d野就知你係乜水啦。你被根叔串
>?>A
>>>你都經常串根叔啦。
>>下...我幾時有寸根叔??
>下...=.="
>我唔係話你喎,我話波咋嘛.....
he should be mouth water!
[> Subject: Re: "留根"不能留!


Author:
陳健成
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 02:11:29 10/11/03 Sat

閣下之言認真不敢苟同, 根叔教學認真, 又學識淵博, 實能稱為「好老師」。未知閣下何以出此惡言, 是否只因吸煙一事? 吸煙乃個人嗜好, 如不影響別人, 又何需大肆口誅筆伐? 好言相勸, 做人宜有寬容之心, 只忌胡亂批評.........
[> [> Subject: Re: "留根"不能留!


Author:
xxx
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 12:56:03 10/12/03 Sun

>閣下之言認真不敢苟同, 根叔教學認真, 又學識淵博,
>實能稱為「好老師」。未知閣下何以出此惡言,
>是否只因吸煙一事? 吸煙乃個人嗜好, 如不影響別人,
>又何需大肆口誅筆伐? 好言相勸, 做人宜有寬容之心,
>只忌胡亂批評.........
first of all, he is not really serious about teaching, he rarly mark the homework we give him.
every lesson he waste about 30% time to talk about some irrelevant things,sometime erotic things=.=.

being a teacher, i think he should be a model of his students, so it is not appropriate for him to smoke infront on the students!!!
[> [> [> Subject: Re: "留根"不能留!


Author:
根's supportor
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 18:41:42 10/12/03 Sun

to smoke infront on the students
>> It should be in front of stundents! 還有,他在何時smoke **in front of** students?
>> 何謂irrelevent? 如果你認為教syllabus 才是relevent, 你便大錯特錯了!
[> [> [> [> Subject: Re: "留根"不能留!


Author:
xxx
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 19:48:00 10/12/03 Sun

>to smoke infront on the students
>>> It should be in front of stundents!
>還有,他在何時smoke **in front of** students?
>>> 何謂irrelevent? 如果你認為教syllabus 才是relevent,
>你便大錯特錯了!
he smoke infront of his student in the last year's class pinic, all 6A(now 7A)students saw it!!!
its too many irrelevent things in his lessons
e.g the conversation between he and his son........
[> [> [> [> Subject: Re: so what


Author:
yyy
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 21:34:00 10/12/03 Sun

BA避靜夠響我地面前食煙la,又唔見你講.

真係人善遭人欺,馬善遭人騎.
[> [> [> [> [> Subject: Re: so what


Author:
xxx
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 22:11:34 10/12/03 Sun

> BA避靜夠響我地面前食煙la,又唔見你講.
>
>真係人善遭人欺,馬善遭人騎.
but, do u think BA is right?
BA is not God, he may also do something wrong!!!
if BA murder someone can Mr lai also kill someone???

if smokoing is right,why two of my classmates were given a bad point last year when they amoke outside the school and discovered by a teacher. is that fair for teachers to smoke and pounish those students who smoke??? double standard will always make people sick!!!

i have never seen BA smoke, and i have never 避靜 with him. if he do so infront of students, he should be blamed also!!!

i have mentioned befort that teachers should be a model of all studends, they can do everything they like, but not infront of students.
dont 盲目support him and treat something he does wrong as right please!!!
[> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: Re: so what


Author:
根's supportor
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 22:23:56 10/12/03 Sun

阿哥,我並沒有說smoking是對
正如成吉思汗所說煙癮難頂,若你沒有smoking habit,你沒有資格評論根叔smoking,因為你根本唔明白他的感受
還有,你迴避了What is irrelerent 這問題!因此我不可評論你話他說too many irrelerent stuff
[> Subject: Re: "留根"不能留!


Author:
非吸煙者
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 15:58:37 10/11/03 Sat

如果吸煙影響唔到人,餐廳就唔駛設立非吸煙區啦∼
[> [> Subject: 兄台,我想你誤解了陳師兄之意


Author:
成吉思汗
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 17:56:08 10/11/03 Sat

如不影響別人=在不影響人的情況下
在餐廳吸煙當然影響人啦
根叔煙癮難頂,佢自己都知
為了不影響學生,佢次次都躲在校工室或天台吸煙
當你染上煙癮,便很難成功戒掉,根叔都唔想
[> Subject: Re: "留根"不能留!


Author:
7A boy
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 18:07:01 10/13/03 Mon

'如果你認為教syllabus 才是relevent, 你便大錯特錯了!'
It's the public examination that makes us focus on the relevent syllabus first rather than the irrelevent syllabus.
Actually he always hurt students but he didn't know.
One example is that, one 7A classmate want to be the class monitor a lot but he was not elected by other classmates. He asked Mr Lai for the post. Mr Lai said 'don't hurt his confidence la' and let him be the class monitor finally. But he did not think that this would let that classmate has a wrong mind: Everything he can get it even without others' support.
Another example is that, one 7A classmate want to participate in the Hong Kong Schools Speech Festival for the Chinese Public Speaking. Mr Lai thought that he is not suitable to join but he did not do anything to train him. Instead, he said 'don't hurt his confidence la' and did not let him join the competition. But he did not think that this would let that classmate has a wrong mind too: I cannot join the competition according to Mr Lai, so I am useless.
I don't know what else he did to other schoolmates, and I only urge him think more deeply about students' thoughts when doing anything further in the future.
[> [> Subject: 以下的情節會令大家評擊我


Author:
個人意見
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 18:16:30 10/13/03 Mon

但我一定要講:
當你出到出面,你會感到你從未感到的人情冷暖
根叔這樣做是補償了世界教育的一個漏洞--太過保護學生
唔好話學生的自尊心重要,他其實在訓練你
這些小事也忍不到的話,你將來怎樣做大事?
[> [> [> Subject: Re:完全認同


Author:
過氣師兄
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 20:34:50 10/13/03 Mon

坦白說,現今的教育和社會風氣的確令青少年得到過份的保護.導致他們認為社會上的人事是100%公平的.因此一遇到不如意時便不懂得沉住氣和應變.

此外,大概由於家長的過於照顧.直接令現在個別的青少年真的裙腳得很.本人是在一間大公司工作的.早前公司為大學畢業生面試時,竟發現一些大學生在面試過程前後竟要父母陪同一起.聽一位人事部朋友說,有兩位面試者(其中一位是中大女畢業生)竟然說其實我唔想出來搵工做野咁辛苦,只不過父母要我搵工.後者更在面試過程中無端端哭.此外一些應徵者更不諱言選擇大公司是因為大公司即使表現差,都冇咁易炒云云.

這方面,我倒對聖芳濟學生感到有點高興.因為最少從九濟堂也可以看到濟記人或多或少在成長中也可以經歷和忍受一定程度的不公和怨氣.而且校方也多不會為同學解困.這其實是全人教育的一部份.沒有遭受過風吹雨打的花草是不會成長成大樹的.
[> [> Subject: Re: "留根"不能留!


Author:
根's supportor
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 18:21:35 10/13/03 Mon

It's the public examination that makes us focus on the relevent syllabus first rather than the irrelevent syllabus.
>>所以根叔冇錯,就算係都係考試局
>>What is irrelevent syllabus again? The one provided by HKEA? BA said that if you just want to learn the so-called relevent syllabus, then go to the tutorial school instead of the school!
[> [> Subject: Re: "留根"不能留!


Author:
F7 boy
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 17:40:55 10/14/03 Tue

I don't expect to have so much replies on my message. Actually I just say a few words in come.to/sfxc only, so I don't think that I am 不懂得沉住氣和應變 when 遇到不如意時.
'校方多不會為同學解困.這其實是全人教育的一部份.沒有遭受過風吹雨打的花草是不會成長成大樹的'
I want to ask if 校方不會為同學解困, how can the school different from the society? I agree '沒有遭受過風吹雨打的花草是不會成長成大樹的', but after '遭受過風吹雨打' cannot '成長成大樹' without the school's support and education, so I cannot agree that not taking care of students is part of the education for the school. No one teaches you in the society but in the school, there should be teachers teaching students, otherwise, students will NEVER know what is going wrong and they will do wrong again in the society as they were in school.
I don't say that Mr Lai is a bad teacher. But what I want to say is only that, he should think deeply of what others think before doing anything else, not only for students. If he has his point, but he doesn't share it with others, and others cannot get his point, it will be extremely easy that others will misunderstand him and it's not good to himself.
'唔好話學生的自尊心重要,他其實在訓練你'
I am sorry. I cannot get Mr Lai's point of training the students in the example.
[> [> [> Subject: 你真有趣啦~


Author:
@o@
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 22:12:28 10/15/03 Wed

>I don't expect to have so much replies on my message.
>Actually I just say a few words in come.to/sfxc only,
>so I don't think that I am 不懂得沉住氣和應變 when
>遇到不如意時.

你都識講你上黎"just say a few words",證明人地回你msg唔係pinpoint你啦.
君不見九濟堂頂頭幾隻字嗎? 「公道自在人心」
至於點解咁多人回你個msg,你既留言荷刻程度可想之知。

>'校方多不會為同學解困.這其實是全人教育的一部份.沒有遭受
>過風吹雨打的花草是不會成長成大樹的'
>I want to ask if 校方不會為同學解困, how can the
>school different from the society? I agree
>'沒有遭受過風吹雨打的花草是不會成長成大樹的', but
>after '遭受過風吹雨打' cannot '成長成大樹' without the
>school's support and education, so I cannot agree that
>not taking care of students is part of the education
>for the school. No one teaches you in the society but
>in the school, there should be teachers teaching
>students, otherwise, students will NEVER know what is
>going wrong and they will do wrong again in the
>society as they were in school.

Wahaha~真係有趣!!你既說法好似認同佢既講法但係又唔認同佢既做法,明顯地你根本上就是一知半解。
你根本就唔明「沒有遭受過風吹雨打的花草是不會成長成大樹的」的真正意思...
試問一下你一出世時便懂得行嗎? 你學行時未嘗跌倒的滋味?
在你學行時跌倒,如果你爸爸媽媽因而一路扶住你唔比你跌,你認為你學得成走路嗎?不學會跌倒便不會學會走路,這是一個十分顯淺的道理..
正如你所說,"No one teaches you in the society but in the school",現在不讓同學在學校這相對比較安全的地方跌跌,他日出到社會時,誰來教他? 在校內時,雖然會有一d人好像你一樣只懂在別人面前扮乖仔,暗地裹卻在暗箭傷人,但是相比起社會上的爾虞我詐,學校的環境還是安全的..

>I don't say that Mr Lai is a bad teacher. But what I
>want to say is only that, he should think deeply of
>what others think before doing anything else, not only
>for students.

暗箭傷人之後話自己是無意的,勁!

If he has his point, but he doesn't
>share it with others, and others cannot get his point,
>it will be extremely easy that others will
>misunderstand him and it's not good to himself.
>'唔好話學生的自尊心重要,他其實在訓練你'
>I am sorry. I cannot get Mr Lai's point of training
>the students in the example.

我相信你是一個exceptional case.. 個個都接受到你接受唔到?
會唔會係以往你接受的都是填鴨式教育,依家比根叔教唔習慣呀?
最後有一句贈你的,「學習是自己的,別問別人可以給你什麼,應問自己想學多少」
[> [> [> [> Subject: You are funny too


Author:
F7 boy
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 19:09:57 10/16/03 Thu

If you talk about 學習, I just want to say learning is two-side co-operation. It's not only teachers and students' fault for the failure in learning process.
Maybe our point of view is different la.
But I don't think my words are 荷刻 wor
Actually I share the same point with you: 公道自在人心!
[> Subject: Re: "留根"不能留!


Author:
王虫
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 21:57:18 10/13/03 Mon

五個字:支持黎留根
[> Subject: Re: "留根"不能留!


Author:
Muscle----2003 Graduated
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 02:24:03 10/14/03 Tue

根叔絕對係一個好人,佢係食煙,咁又點呀!!!!BA,DC夠食啦!你又唔去嘈佢,根叔食煙關你鬼事,你又阻到佢咩!我雖然未被根叔真真正正教過,但同佢傾計,你可以學到好多浀p中國歷史,仲有佢可以出口成文(起碼可講足15mins),阿波,你又得唔得呀!如果你真係咁勁,你就應該比SFX更勁的學校啦!如果唔係,唔該你收聲,靜靜地聽人講書!
阿波,你唔好係度不停咁責罵老師,你又做過老師未?你教過書未?唔知就係度嘈三嘈四,咁鬼得閒上網,不如去圖書館抄多灡悒穧n,你既然覺得根叔唔好,你就應要去Library抄多灡恁A豐富自己未能係堂上讀ga!!!!反省黻!
[> [> Subject: 作為一位老師, 身教是否比言教重要?


Author:
KT Chong Wolf 2 Muscle(?) claim down la~
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 00:15:12 10/15/03 Wed

Near all classmate in 7A (T. Ho 2003) know that I want to be a Chinese teacher. However, I feel strange when I see the banner in HKied's open day. "For learning independently, to teach professionally" How can it be? So, I ask the following question in Intranet:
作為一位老師, 身教是否比言教重要?

問題是:如果身教是比言教重要,孔子自己也有一定的不足.

如果言教是比身教重要,咁毫無品德者皆可為師? (不是三人行必有我師的師)

And here are some replies:
Mr. Kung:
請問教physics如何用身教?

Russell Fung:
Physics用身教相信是沒有問題的﹐斷估也不會有人用違反物理的方式來生活吧﹗ 岑同學的問題使我聯想到西方社會有一句不懂以身作則的人常用的話(電影中也有時聽到的): "Do as I Say, not as I do"

Mr. Kung:
1. 那麼,用身體、行為來證明物理學定律是否較在課堂講授物理學重要呢?
2. 我的答案重點並不在「物理學」,是是要岑同學思考是不什麼知識都是身教重於言教。
3. 若岑同學認為不是,那麼便是「看情形而定」。
4. 但岑同學又規定我不能說「看情形而定」,那麼,我可以怎樣回答?

Mr. Kung:
張五常是一位好經濟老師嗎?

I got the answer. Can you? If no, go to Intranet and look for it is not a bad choice.
[> Subject: Re: "留根"不能留!


Author:
support 根叔 forever...
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 21:29:03 10/15/03 Wed

你接埋啦, "F7 Boy"/ "7A Boy"
係佢面前又唔見你咁講, 成個死刷鞋仔
而家冇人知你係邊個就扮哂野咁, 係度廢 "up"
要話根叔就去佢面前指住佢個頭來話
唔好o係佢面前就扮乖仔...cheap 精

support 根叔 forever...
[> [> Subject: Re: "留根"不能留!


Author:
F7 boy
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 22:03:04 10/15/03 Wed

I have told him my feelings before ga
If you don't believe me, you can ask Mr Lai directly
I think you are the one 扮哂野 wor......
[> [> [> Subject: Re: "留根"不能留!


Author:
support~
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 14:45:31 10/16/03 Thu

>I have told him my feelings before ga
>If you don't believe me, you can ask Mr Lai directly
>I think you are the one 扮哂野 wor......

你低能 gar
無啦啦話人扮哂野?
[> [> [> [> Subject: Re: "留根"不能留!


Author:
7A boy
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 19:01:31 10/16/03 Thu

I am not 無啦啦話人扮哂野
It's nothing wrong to support any people
But it's totally wrong to believe that the one you supported is always doing the right thing
I support Mr Lai too when he is doing right
[> [> [> [> [> Subject: Re: "留根"不能留!


Author:
過氣芳濟人
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 14:24:50 10/17/03 Fri

同學...我睇哂咁多篇文章,都唔明你話根叔錯乜...你話佢唔識教書???唔係呀...中國語文/文化/文學全都是透過文章似引發個人感受/想法既學科,根叔俾時間你地諗先證明佢係好老師ar,如果佢hardcopy佢既想法落你地度,你點會係度"自由批判"呀??你話佢上堂唔盡責??同學,返學唔係等如你識哂課程既保證,你抱持咁既心態上堂,點會對佢既說話聽得入耳?多時間俾你地,你就話佢唔教書,咁你咪要佢講足一堂你先學到野???我讀夜校,ar sir叫你做野既次數多過佢講書,我唔覺有乜問題,佢認為你get到個要點,就重要就係多做多寫.正如根叔上堂,我俾佢教過我中四個年(文學),又係咁多時間俾我地,但佢講明時間係俾你了解課文而唔係玩.所以我認為根叔所有時間都用係教學上,只係用唔同既方法,你唔認同佢既方法,亦唔好一知半解咁去批評佢.至於食煙..同學,你中幾呀?諗法咁唔成熟??老師無錯係我地既榜樣..但只係部份,並不是全部,你知根叔食煙唔好,咁咪唔好學law,咁樣佢食煙對雙方無影響ga?你都大個la,唔再係心智都極幼稚,就算佢唔係你眼前食煙,你都知ga la,就重要係你有你價值觀...
所以,我認為從學生觀點看,根叔絕對是一個好老師!
[> Subject: 斬草要『留根』...........


Author:
無我
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 17:01:26 10/17/03 Fri

根叔絕對係一個好人好老師.........
我話佢好......因為佢平易近人..............
我話佢好......因為佢教到我好多做人既道理.....
我話佢好......因為佢唔虛偽........
我話佢好......因為佢講既歪理好適合而家呢個歪既社會....
我話佢好......因為佢真係博學,學貫中西,而且博覽群書.....
我話佢好......因為佢真材實料,比我偶像公佬更勝一籌.....
我話佢好......因為佢言出必行...........
我話佢好......因為佢處事圓滑,值得學習......
我話佢好......因為知道黎根細個果陣好坎坷架..........佢亦自封為死剩種......佢食煙.....可能係遺傳.........
留根細個真係好慘架.....佢今時今日教到我地書實在好難得架....大家睇到佢果名.....就知唔係搞笑架..........
[> [> Subject: Re: 點止呀,


Author:
老兵
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 07:58:57 10/18/03 Sat

早三年根叔家庭還出了問題,令他要現在獨力照顧對仔女和年過八十的高堂.他當時雖然打擊很大,但仍可咬緊牙關頂下去.這種強悍的性格真值得學習.

你地唔好睇佢平時好似無所謂咁,但一涉及大是大非時,佢一樣可以堅持個人立場,不偏不依.
[> Subject: Re: "留根"不能留!


Author:
7A student
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 11:08:50 10/18/03 Sat

嘩~你條友仔都幾過份喎,話人死刷鞋仔,你知人地係邊個呀?你未又係度刷曬鞋咁啦,....我本來都唔很想講,我就係對根X冇好感,佢都知我唔
like佢...let me use the following examples to show how bad he is:

1:我地班有一個成績好好gei人,佢全級頭三名,但係根x呢條友話佢高分低能,仲要唔至一次,你地諗下對方點諗...
2:佢對班中某幾個學生講'我唔係針對你地,我係關心你地先罰你地,但過幾日,佢地問why only罰佢地,跟住佢對佢地講"呢個world係唔會有fair."你地話係咩野意思...
3:有一日我地簽名去支持係非典照顧病人gei醫護人員,佢竟然話"洗鬼簽咩"...

以上只係其中幾個例子,未能打曬出泥...

最後我好有興趣知道"support 根叔 forever..."真人係咩水,夠膽係度留名啦,睇下你點樣串法,係未真係有料到...唔好係度扮曬野
[> [> Subject: 支持根叔!!!!


Author:
任儲豪 7A 2003
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 17:46:08 10/18/03 Sat

我擺明撐根叔....
你又是阿水呀?
[> [> [> Subject: Re: 支持根叔!!!!


Author:
7A student
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 23:09:54 10/18/03 Sat

我未就係接你棒做chairman果個囉~~
[> [> Subject: Re: "留根"不能留!


Author:
根;s supporter!
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 22:23:08 10/18/03 Sat

我唔知人地係邊個? 你咪低能啦...我唔係好想爆佢個身份lor
不過你叫到lor..冇法啦
用得英文...又好似好勁同根叔討論問題的咪就係我地班中化第一, 但剛剛一次輸幾分個...好多人都唔like 個...lor
[> [> [> Subject: Re: "留根"不能留!


Author:
7A student
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 23:18:36 10/18/03 Sat

>我唔知人地係邊個? 你咪低能啦...我唔係好想爆佢個身份lor
>不過你叫到lor..冇法啦
>用得英文...又好似好勁同根叔討論問題的咪就係我地班中化第
>一, 但剛剛一次輸幾分個...好多人都唔like 個...lor

我都知你係邊個,haha!!
[> [> [> [> Subject: Re: "留根"不能留!


Author:
supporter
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 15:48:44 10/19/03 Sun

>>我唔知人地係邊個? 你咪低能啦...我唔係好想爆佢個身份lor
>>不過你叫到lor..冇法啦
>>用得英文...又好似好勁同根叔討論問題的咪就係我地班中化?>?>>一, 但剛剛一次輸幾分個...好多人都唔like 個...lor
>
>我都知你係邊個,haha!!

唔好扮哂野亂估...
[> [> Subject: Re: "留根"不能留!


Author:
秋 (02-03 F7 畢業)
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 01:28:33 10/23/03 Thu

我認為根叔係一個好老師

估唔到依家濟記讀到f7 0既同學d質素咁低劣,一個叻人唔應該只係讀書好就得,佢仲要有謙虛之心不斷求進.俾人話一兩句高分低能就hurt到佢自尊心0既話呢個人都真係幾無用,俾佢全級第一又如何,咪又係廢物一個

至於佢0既教書方式係好要求自己去諗去思考,一d受慣填鴨式教育0既普通同學自不然會好唔認同,不過我可以話俾你知,佢講一堂書頂多係0係考試有用,但係佢講一堂irrelevant 0既0野分分鐘你呢世都用得著

我都不知幾想聽佢講"廢話"....唉,好懷念中六七上中化堂,都不知幾正.....
[> [> [> Subject: Re: "留根"不能留!


Author:
supporter
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 13:15:22 10/23/03 Thu

>估唔到依家濟記讀到f70既同學d質素咁低劣,一個叻人唔應該只係讀書好就得,佢仲要有謙虛之心不斷求進.俾人話一兩句高分低能就hurt到佢自尊心0既話呢個人都真係幾無用,俾佢全級第一又如何,咪又係廢物一?>?>

大佬, 你話人之前可否睇清內容先呀?
被根叔話高分低能的個自尊心有冇被人 hurt 你點知 lei?
係 d 攻擊根叔皎人借此過橋來作他們所謂的論點

有謙虛之心不斷求進, 佢都有齊
而且我深信佢在今次 final 中一定可以全級第一
[> Subject: 根叔叔---我最尊敬的老師之一


Author:
蔡俊浩
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 15:43:15 10/18/03 Sat

第一次比根叔叔教...係我中五既時候既中文
果時因為李劍雄去左中大,所以我就有機會比根叔叔教我短短半年左右了

根叔叔既思維,很富哲學性~~又有深度...我記得果時上佢堂要抄黎應付syllabus既notes唔多,但係我都抄到我成課都滿晒.....就是因為根叔叔每幾句就出一句值得令人深思的說話...

淨係跟根叔叔學半年野....真係太少
[> Subject: Re: "留根"不能留!


Author:
一個想入U既人
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 00:57:31 10/19/03 Sun

已經唔係身教與否既問題,係根叔叔人際關係既問題
[> Subject: Re: "留根"不能留!


Author:
小薯仔 健
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 02:26:47 10/20/03 Mon

閣下認為根叔上堂講既都係廢話 實在係大錯特錯 雖則有時根叔會同同學閒話家常 但大部分時間講既都同課文有關 例如課文既歷史背景同用典出處 這些資料看似廢話 但係會幫你完完全全理解作者寫作該文的用意 呢種間接幫助同學了解課文既方法是謂啟發
根叔既教學方法在於啟發 而唔係重於訓導 各人資質有所不同 可能前者不適合閣下 但閣下亦無理由全盤否定前者
再者 同根叔閒聊 你會搵到好多做人處世既道理 雖然有些道理因根叔既個人際遇而有所歪曲 但大部份會令你心智步向成熟 不再幼稚 我題議閣下打開耳朵 用心聆聽根叔上堂講既話 一定能獲益良多
[> [> Subject: Re: "根"不能留!


Author:
受害者
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 02:43:29 10/24/03 Fri

根叔經常廢話連編 大家都知
根叔歪曲道理 教壞同學
閒話家常 不教課文
Hurt人唔駛本 無品無品
害人害物 此"根"不能留!
[> Subject: 唔好咁細路~


Author:
師兄中五畢業in 2000
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 05:01:40 10/24/03 Fri

好耐無黎九濟堂~
睇完d留言個感覺好唔好~
估唔到九濟d人今日搞成咁~
講真我覺得九濟d老師算係咁,你地咁不滿,第日你地出去d九流學校讀就知味道~
同埋我對某幾位人兄有d不滿,留言可唔可以唔好好似潑婦罵街咁?
剩係識投訴,你係咁不滿就留底名,我搵日返濟記同你計計佢~
[> Subject: 我覺得......


Author:
唔好問我係邊個,ok?
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 01:59:50 10/25/03 Sat

雖然根叔所講o既有時係好負面
但係對我地都有好多得著
同埋大家俾佢教得o既都高中啦
唔再係老師講咩就學咩o既階段
你們有自己o既思想架嗎
如果你認為根叔講得唔arm o既
你可以係心裡什至當面反駁佢
係反駁o既過程 可以啟發我地o既思維
所以根本都係學緊野
至於開post果條友可以唔使理佢
我覺得佢根本就係上堂俾根叔寸完之後唔順超
面對面又唔夠人講 咪係到發洩囉......
仲有d人話根叔教壞人....
我想問佢真係咁勁教得壞你!?
d人覺得果d所謂教壞人o既說話大多數都係反映現實社會o既情況
咁你最多可以講呢個現實社會教壞你
同學....其實根叔寸你 hurt你貪好玩咩
佢咁做一定有理由 佢知道自已一定會有好多閒言閒語
但仍然係咁做 佢為咩呀...
要記住...對學生好o既老師唔一定要係果隻
循循善誘 苦口婆心o既型像囉
最後 如果俾人hurt幾下都話就唔得 自尊心咁脆弱...你第日點算呀....
[> Subject: Re: "留根"不能留!


Author:
鬧根叔ge真係好無聊
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 14:51:14 10/25/03 Sat

連根叔呢d好老師都鬧
真係唔係人黎架
根叔講野好有道理
佢話我地係過份受到保護
未經歷過人情冷暖
你話佢hurt你
你又知唔知咩叫hurt呢?
出面社會d人心險惡
對住你就笑住口
背住你就桶你兩刀
呢d就真係hurt喇
[> [> Subject: Re: 容許我引用朱啟祥師兄的話


Author:
手非長
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 21:22:22 10/25/03 Sat

在三年前,有一個星期有三位師兄返回濟記代課.其中一位是我f.4時已代過我課的朱sir.他知道根叔是我們班的班主任,即與我們分享自己中學生涯中感到最有意義的科目.由於他AL phy,applied,pure都是A的.
所以我地估應該是數學掛......非也,而是根叔在他中四時教的中國文學科.他說最重要的不是這科的知識,而是根叔訓練他們的思想,個人修為和批判方式,以及不少做人處世的道理.根叔也令他們了解社會的陰暗面和處理工作的方法.
朱sir說在這科所學到的真是一生受用.無論是他在工作上待人接物或是在生活上遭遇問題時,根叔的言論有時真的有如金石良言.

所以大家現在誤解根叔唔重要,但出來社會以後就知道根叔的言論是否過於負面和無中生有.
[> Subject: Re: "留根"不能留!


Author:
無情
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 00:52:02 10/26/03 Sun

各位師兄師弟....我地唔好再討論落去啦....根叔係好係差大家其實係心知肚明....只不過係被一d有心中傷既人無的放矢...正所謂『公道自在人心』.....我地咁討論落去先之係對根叔既侮辱呀.......
[> [> Subject: Re: "留根"不能留!


Author:
師兄米高
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 23:28:39 10/27/03 Mon

永遠支持黎留根


[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT+7
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.