VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 123[4] ]


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 20:37:54 11/09/03 Sun
Author: No name
Subject:
In reply to: 's message, "誹謗法律" on 20:35:38 11/09/03 Sun

從事法律及傳媒工作逾十年的劉進圖,指本港法律可接受較主觀、偏激,甚至誇張的評論,但必須符合「誠實評論」(Fair Comment)的條件﹕一是有若干的事實根據,令一般人在整體上亦可能得出近似印象或評論﹔二是關乎公眾利益。

 劉指出,所謂「誠實評論」並非要求公正合理,因評論是很難分真假的,亦非要合理才可發表。「例如文學評論中對某作家的褒與貶亦一定帶有主觀色彩。即使說這人完全不配做個作家,在言論自由的社會中亦是允許……但如果你不曾看過人家的作品便大肆攻擊,那就欠缺事實根據了。」

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Post a message:
This forum requires an account to post.
[ Create Account ]
[ Login ]
[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT+8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.