Create a New Forum Admin Login Member Login Contribute to Voyager Search VoyForums Help Desk VoyForums Exchange VoyForums Directory/Categories VoyForums Homepage VoyForums News FAQ - Frequently Asked Questions

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, [2], 3 ]

Subject: Purity Author: George Phillies [ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ] Date Posted: 10:51:13 12/09/02 Mon In my opinion, the quoted historical interpretation of the Nolan statement is entirely in error. We have the record in Nolan's own words, after all. According to Nolan, as he has repeatedly said: He wrote the statement to make clear that we we were not a collection of bombthrowers out to overthrow the government by violence. He was not at all refering to the remarks of Ayn Rand. [ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Subject Author Date Re: Purity Tom Howe 18:45:14 12/18/02 Wed