VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1[2]3 ]
Subject: Constitution


Author:
TW
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 20:29:27 12/27/02 Fri

Article. 1 Section. 10. "No State shall, without the Consent of Congress, ...keep Troops,... or engage in War, unless actually invaded, or in such imminent Danger as will not admit of delay." Ask yourself, if a state can not keep troops, how can the state defend its self if invaded? Now if a state keeps paid standing militia members, would not the state be keeping troops? So sense the state can not keep troops, how was the state expected to defend itself if invaded? The answer is the Citizen's militia members! Militia armies are good at defending their own countries, but are no good at attacking other countries, and thus avoid foreign wars. Both militia defense and neutrality thus promote the ideals of peace.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]



Forum timezone: GMT-3
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.