Re: Bruce Kumar Frantzis -- Chen Pan Ling Taijiquan

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Mon, Apr 29 2024, 2:57:34 PDT [ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: Sun, Apr 25 2004, 14:09:39 PDT
Author: Dave
Author Host/IP: ip68-231-125-141.ph.ph.cox.net / 68.231.125.141
Subject: Re: Bruce Kumar Frantzis
In reply to: Khari 's message, "Re: Bruce Kumar Frantzis" on Sun, Apr 25 2004, 9:06:47 PDT

Ok, I was finally able to view the CPL clip. What he is doing is pretty but doesn't even remotely resemble what we were taught! This concerns me as I was not aware that I was so out of touch!
It goes back to what I originally said. How can a given form change so radically on a fundamental basis over 10 or 15 years?
Where did you take your CPL training? My wife and I both trained from '89 to '94 at the Rochester T'ai Chi Ch'uan Center. I recently requested and received an updated demo tape from them and the CPL form is being peformed EXACTLY the way it was when we were there!
I am NOT by any means trying to be an authority here as many of my peers have far more experience than I however I WOULD like to know what we were taught if not genuine CPL!
It is also worthy of mentioning that we are in possession of the original videotapes of Master Kai Sung, including several recorded in his youth. It is understood that Master Kai is/was a direct exponent of Master Chen Pan Ling. These tapes show a precise continuity of the basic style over an estimated period of 25 to 30 years.
My direct question then is: Was Master Kai wrong?

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Re: Bruce Kumar Frantzis -- Khari, Mon, Apr 26 2004, 19:43:21 PDT (user-2ivecda.dialup.mindspring.com/165.247.49.170)
- Re: Bruce Kumar Frantzis -- Brian, Tue, May 04 2004, 12:53:51 PDT (roc-66-67-184-125.rochester.rr.com/66.67.184.125)
  - Re: Bruce Kumar Frantzis -- Khari, Tue, May 04 2004, 17:25:09 PDT (user-2ivebn1.dialup.mindspring.com/165.247.46.225)
    - Re: Bruce Kumar Frantzis -- Isaac, Fri, May 27 2005, 8:49:19 PDT (adsl-69-107-19-98.dsl.pltn13.pacbell.net/69.107.19.98)
      - Re: Bruce Kumar Frantzis -- Jampa Mackenzie Stewart, Mon, Jun 26 2006, 2:22:16 PDT (cpe-66-68-143-196.austin.res.rr.com/66.68.143.196)
        Re: Bruce Kumar Frantzis -- Khari, Thu, Jul 06 2006, 22:46:47 PDT (cpe-72-229-167-226.nyc.res.rr.com/72.229.167.226)
        Re: Bruce Kumar Frantzis -- xyq, Thu, Nov 30 2006, 17:05:15 PST (adsl-68-124-27-50.dsl.pltn13.pacbell.net/68.124.27.50)
        Re: Bruce Kumar Frantzis -- wayne hansen, Wed, Jan 30 2008, 21:29:19 PST (NoHost/144.138.102.20)