| Subject: Re: First topic for discussion. |
Author:
-Chaos
|
[
Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message
]
Date Posted: 20:13:02 01/15/02 Tue
In reply to:
Neocount
's message, "First topic for discussion." on 17:20:10 01/15/02 Tue
Diablo series of course, should be supported. The other Blizzard games should all be supported, In my opinion as well.
We will starve to death (as we are) with the current intrest in the Diablo Series. D2/LoD = Great game, not the replay of the original. Truth have it, it shames the original, yet I won't play it 6 years after it's release... and you probably won't either.
SC/BW -Old, but good, still going strong, and people are still buying them... broadens view, and WC III will probably be a good addition. The only oddball Bliz release for b-net, in my eyes, is WC II B-net Edition... I have only know a rare few that play it... and I don't think it will sustain itself. It's addition will probably be more practicial when we consider how easy we make it to add games. In our old structure, it was very hard, and nearly impossible which is why it was never done, plus the fact that no one finished their work on it. But again, the reason it was never finished was because our guild wasn't tailored to support anything but the Diablo series.
This Darkbane, I think it was, or maybe Shadowbane, it sounds interesting. Although, in my past, through this current day, I have refused to purchase any game that was pay to play. If they want me to pay to play, give me my copy free. The CD only costs them a fraction of a cent to make, and they'll make plenty of money from subscriptions, if they made a good game.
Personal preference... I'd probably play a great pay to play game, and decide to go with it... but I refuse to play them at the moment. My decision would laregly be swayed if we introduced them to the guild.
EQ is... more or less old. and UO is as well. I'd need to see some numbers crunched on the idea of supporting those.
Also, adding games means added guild positions. Don't add 43 games when we only have 20 members... it ain't gonna be pretty.
Just consider that last bit here before we jump on and add every suggestion. I know we won't be able to finalize any of it really untill we map out our rules a bit, but we could more or less create our rules to function around the games supported.
That's it... hope that wasn't too long, because it sure did seem like it while I was typing.
-Chaos
>It's only fitting that we start off with the core of
>any gaming guild, the gamming! The first topic is the
>guild platform. What game(s) will we support? Many
>have expressed an interest in possibly expanding the
>game support base, and a few have been sceptical of
>the idea in the past.
>
>Should we stick with the Diablo series, or should we
>expand and add more games? If so, what games and why?
>Discuss!
>
>I will post an idea War and I thought up at a later
>time, if War doesn't beat me to it :)
>
>Semper Fi,
>-Neocount
[
Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message
]
| |
Feedback: 