VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 123[4] ]
Subject: Re: I wish I had some idea what all this raving means...


Author:
Thomas Koulos
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 13:14:07 06/17/05 Fri
In reply to: Ned Depew 's message, "I wish I had some idea what all this raving means..." on 09:14:33 06/17/05 Fri

Perhaps one of your FoH guiding Lights can refer you to the short lived Gomez paper that is clearly writen for your intelectual understanding.P.S. Gene and I are waiting for your facts on the SLC layoffs with your factual clearity.:):)Did Byrne give you a copy of his books with his autograph in it??:):)Tom Koulos

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:
[> [> [> [> [> Subject: I've already given you the facts about SLC.


Author:
Ned Depew
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 17:53:02 06/17/05 Fri

The facts are that no permanent employees of SLC lost thier jobs as a result of the rejection fo the proposal for the Greenport plant.

Three contract employees who were specifically hired to work on the Greenport project through its approval or rejection were let go when the proposal was withdrawn, but the same number of people are employed by SLC in the region at this time ase were employed at the launch of the proposal in 1999. Those are the facts.
[> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: Re: I've already given you the facts about SLC.


Author:
Gene
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 08:09:18 06/18/05 Sat

The Gays have the same rights as we do. They just don't have to keep waving it in our faces all the time. If two fellas wanted to get married who weren't gay would that be alright?
[> [> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: No one's waving anything in your face, Gene,


Author:
Ned Depew
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 22:00:28 06/18/05 Sat

If we allow some competent, adult citizens the right to form a household and take advantage of all the privileges and undertake all the responsibilities that involves, then we must do it for all competent adult citizens. Otherwise rights are not "equal." It's a pretty simple concept.

Why should gay life partners not have the same rights - to retirement and social security benefits earned in concert, to community property, to act as health proxy, to child custody - that are routinely and unquestioningly awarded to heterosexual life partners?

People are asking for basic fairness, Gene - equal treatment under law - which our Constitution guarantees to all citizens. Where I come from, if you make a promise and you want to consider yourself a person of honor, you had better keep it. Is it different where you grew up?



[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT-5
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.