consumer protection(fair trading)act -- Timeshare Victims Support Group

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Mon, May 19 2025, 19:43:00

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, [10] ]

Subject: consumer protection(fair trading)act

Author:
sgmc

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: Thu, Jan 15 2004, 10:46:25
In reply to: Jamie 's message, "consumer protection (fair trading) act" on Mon, Jan 12 2004, 22:21:36

As your agreement(contract) is very recent, you can seek recourse even when there is no cooling off period stated.
As you feel that you've been "conned" then there is a case that you have signed the agreement(contract)under duress and as such there is 'no contract',inspite of all the disclaimers you might have signed.
So you can apply for this agreement(contract) to be void with full refund.
Please get a legal representative to write a demand letter to void the contract. CASE will not do that as they are not Lawyers. They can only mediate, in other words, drink kopi and talk.
Cheers

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[> [> Subject: what is the main changes in the old act and the new act???
Author: Valeria [ Edit \| View ]	Date Posted: Tue, Mar 02 2004, 22:03:22 Im very puzzled that wat is actually the main changes in the act? Is it that previously most unfair practices are unble to claim damages??? [ Post a Reply to This Message ]