VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, [3] ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 16:06:24 11/25/03 Tue
Author: Eric
Subject: Re: Bush Approves Nukes
In reply to: QUITTNER 's message, "Re: Bush Approves Nukes" on 12:00:35 11/25/03 Tue

>Eric, the US was attacked on September 11th, 2001, and
>there now is not only a war on poverty, and on drugs,
>but also on terrorism. It is very difficult and very
>expensive to wage three wars at the same time; every
>country, including the enemy country, is obliged to do
>their best in any and all wars to reach final victory
>or at least a favorable and honorable cease-fire. Any
>all means/weapons to that end are not only required,
>but even necessary if needed, however terrible, and
>even international treaties may have to be ignored if
>any one of the enemies has ignored any of the treaty
>obligations/provisions.
>..... Christianity originally required all members to
>live a communal lifestyle in separate communities,
>with ALL members being quite peaceful and meek, so
>that within those communities there was no danger of
>wars, nor even of intentional other kinds of hurtings.
>But outsiders (the Romans) killed Jesus and interfered
>with the operations of that very early version of
>Christianity, so that later versions were needed
>designed not only to appease the Romans, but also to
>attract as many non-Jews as possible into a very
>different version of membership that very likely Jesus
>would have rejected.

OK? I personally believe that there is no peace so long as your enemy is alive. My Lord Jesus Christ believes the same way hence all "Christians" struggle to mortify the deeds of his or her own flesh (our biggest enemy.)
All the things you mentioned have and must come to pass.

Forgive me but I am at a bit of a loss as to your point.

Babylon being totally destroyed (Quite possibly nuked) is prophetic. Could you please enlighten me with a little clearer (or simpler if you prefer) syntax so that I know what you are trying to say? I'm a bit slow at times, I hope you understand. ;-)

Sincerely,

Eric

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.