Re: 文物騙購? -- SFXC forum 九濟堂

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Sun, Jun 16 2024, 21:56:23

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, [2], 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 ]

Subject: Re: 文物騙購?

Author:
唔明

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 21:26:11 07/12/04 Mon
In reply to: 文化討論 's message, "文物騙購?" on 10:51:46 07/12/04 Mon

賣了房子以後一個月，房價卻回升了一成。你能說那個買家混蛋，「廉價騙購」了你的房子嗎？
>>為何不可?我認為係.
(我都有好多次購物被人「廉價騙購」的經驗.)

>>正如上文所說,王道士自己蠢史坦恩明知王道士唔夠「精明」,便哄他,這已是騙了.

>>我記得警訊曾提及一宗詐騙:一個騙徒用一玩具手機作抵押,以電話沒電為藉口哄騙女事主借他電話,再把它搶走
>>案中女事主不夠精明,被騙徒用廉價的玩具手機換為手機,大家借電話都你情我願,唔通呢個唔叫騙?

>>騙購兩字精要地提出了史坦恩騙和購兩個實際動作,簡單易明,作文的人真具文學修養!(My bias)

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]