VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Mon, May 18 2026, 2:06:48Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1234[5]6789 ]
Subject: Re: 釋君之誤解


Author:
成吉思汗
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 23:35:21 04/27/04 Tue
In reply to: 華 's message, "Re: 真好野,外星人都諗到!" on 22:58:41 04/27/04 Tue

唔好意思,應是真正的成功人士.你說的例子只是片刻的成功,不是長廣泛的成功.(沒錯,成功可以是很主觀,但若不從辯論角度來說一個受廣泛認識那人的人認同的人士便是那人客觀的成功,Mr.Bush暫不能做到)

水滸傳方面,我強調我只是以一個例子說明講粗言是人類自古的文化,不足為奇,用以支持講粗言絕對沒有問題之說以及講粗言是粗魯的象徵(若你不認為是粗魯,這可能是你已接受了這文化,不代表在別人眼中是不粗魯),和你的古今不同有何矛盾之處?

想想現今的粗言多是由甚麼字組成?為何字句不帶侮辱性?.你若以非侮辱性的動機講粗言,也一樣會發展不良風氣.因為人家聽了會學,你自己講得多都會在平時罵人時不能控制自己說了侮辱性語言(始終,人是有劣根性).這樣一來,講粗言不是帶有侮辱性嗎?這也是講粗言的壞處.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:
[> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: 同學的價值觀好有問題


Author:
大佬
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 08:49:02 04/28/04 Wed

講粗口梗係冇問題啦
你鐘意講乜都得架
有自由家ma
冇人控制到你
BUT
我只想講

識講粗口=/=要講粗口
[> [> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: Re: 請看我在這篇第一個留言


Author:
成吉思汗
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 16:30:11 04/28/04 Wed

我開宗明義第一句都話講粗口冇問題
[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: Re: 補充


Author:
成吉思汗
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 16:32:53 04/28/04 Wed

因為這是你的權利
但這只會顯示自己的粗魯性格
所以我並不建議講粗口


[> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: Re: 釋君之誤解


Author:

[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 21:43:04 04/28/04 Wed

>說的例子只是片刻的成功
何以會是片刻?難道你已肯定了婚姻的成功只短期的,不能恆久?事業的成功亦是如此?敢問你認為蓋滋成功嗎?pentium的創辦人會千古留名嗎?如果答案是正面的,那麼為何閣下認為那些是片刻的成功?

>想現今的粗言多是由甚麼字組成?為何字句不帶侮辱性?.你若以非侮辱性的動機講粗言,也一樣會發展不良風氣.因為人家聽了會學,你自己講得多都會在平時罵人時不能控制自己說了侮辱性語言(始終,人是有劣根性).這樣一來,講粗言不是帶有侮辱性嗎?這也是講粗言的壞處.
請看對公仔佬的回覆。

>不代表在別人眼中是不粗魯
那又代表每個人也覺得這是粗魯的表現嗎?

[> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: Re: 釋君之誤解


Author:
成吉思汗
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 22:41:21 04/28/04 Wed

我其實只是想說明成功有兩種,一種是主觀的成功,一種是客觀的成功.你所舉的是自我或身在當中的人所感到的成功,而真正的成功人士是那種廣泛地受人認同為成功的人.(不要理會片刻二字,因我用錯了字)

那又代表每個人也覺得這是粗魯的表現嗎?
>>我已說過已深入當中文化的人不會覺得粗魯,又何來每個人也覺得這是粗魯的表現?


[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT+7
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.