I think we have enough negatives from coaches to say the outcome here is.... -- SUPER-LEAGUE BOARD

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

6/05/26 7:35:04pm [ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, [2], 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 27/06/06 10:28:08am
Author: SL
Subject: I think we have enough negatives from coaches to say the outcome here is....
In reply to: Walt 's message, "I think the aim is always to mirror reality" on 26/06/06 11:16:53pm

A warning to the Roos is now handed out, to say that this type of selection tactics is not on, and that if it happens again this year, then the first round selection will be stripped from your side.

It is not a punishment and you shouldn't see it as one, as you didn't know but if ANY side decides to tank obviously, then they will lose their first round pick also.

Last rounds scores will be the top 18 players score on the list.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[> [> [> So if i drop Rocca this week -- RB, 27/06/06 2:07:14pm [1]

Are the Fockers tanking,or am i reacting to his poor performances that have contribuited to the last 2 losses ?

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> Your reacting to his poor form -- SL, 27/06/06 3:05:23pm [1]

You have the right to drop a star player if he is down on form, but if he had of been scoring highly, and you drop him out of the blue, you would just be asked to explain the decision. It is a grey area, but I'm sure moderators can tell whats what.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> With the Fockers @ 8-4 expected that answer,however -- RB, 29/06/06 12:42:21pm [1]

If the Fockers were at 4-8 & Rocca was dropped Q's would probably be asked.The circumstances however are the same (dropping a name player down on form) although the selection of the replacement player would differ.

Fockers 8-4 (going for top 4)..In L.Brown Out A.Rocca
Fockers 4-8 (struggle to make 8).. In M.Pask Out A.Rocca

Understand the concensus opinion here on tanking & have no problem with it but the above is an example of a legitimate tatical change if i beleived the Fockers season was shot & the 8 was not a probable target.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]