VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

6/05/26 7:32:24pmLogin ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1[2]3456789 ]


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 27/06/06 11:40:01pm
Author: Shabby
Subject: Fair enough guys
In reply to: SL 's message, "Issue with Roos selection" on 24/06/06 3:55:51pm

Although I disagree, its fair enough.

And to be fair, my intention wasn't really to tank anyway. Being a split round I named a lot of players from last weeks matches in my 22, knowing that most of them wouldn't play and that more recognised players would come in. And also knowing I was playing a strong side and had no chance of winning, I figured I'd give the kids a run. So its not really tanking if I was never going to win anyway.

I just hope I can continue to have some flexibility with my team. I have a lot of kids and I like to play them when they are named, which I think is mirroring reality and in a way developing my side - it's like an AFL club giving them a shot and giving them experience. I will however ensure my gun players are always named which I think is the main issue here. But it would be a great shame if I am accussed of tanking again if I name some unproven youngsters instead of proven players, even though my personal opinion may be that that the kids would be better than the players they replace.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]


Replies:

[> [> Shabby, I would have no problems at all if you operated per your last paragraph. -- Josh, 28/06/06 8:38:29am [1]

As you said, its about trying to replicate how a club would operate. That is the point about having teams pick to position so that 22 mids aren't named.

A club may well leave out a mid level player to blood youth. Clubs would never leave out their key players though.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]





Post a message:
This forum requires an account to post.
[ Create Account ]
[ Login ]
[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT+9
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.