VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

6/05/26 7:35:08pmLogin ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1[2]3456789 ]


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 11/07/06 7:08:08pm
Author: Josh
Subject: I agree with RB.
In reply to: RB 's message, "Apoligise for the score error" on 11/07/06 6:01:21pm

Looking at that squad there is no way Ottens would have been dropped.

Now I take the point that he dropped Ottens due to reasons other than tanking, but this makes it almost impossible to regulate.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]


Replies:

[> [> [> [> [> Yes not liking a player is no excuse -- Walt, 12/07/06 10:22:35am [1]

We don't have the benefit of dropping players for disciplinary reasons a la Akermanis. Playing "the kids" is no excuse either because they play anyway.

The team had no recognised ruckman so Ottens should've been in it. It didn't make any difference so we shouldn't get too excited but fact is we want to stop the end of the season becoming farcical with teams colluding or going for draft picks. While we don't want to tell Jacko how to run his team (and I don't think we are), all comps have rules and you gotta follow them to avoid anarchy.

So next week I could drop Bradshaw because he's an inconsistant poonce (he scored over 150 last week) and go for the priority pick.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]





Post a message:
This forum requires an account to post.
[ Create Account ]
[ Login ]
[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT+9
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.