streuth -- SUPER-LEAGUE BOARD

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

6/05/26 7:34:06pm [ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, [2], 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 27/07/06 7:06:21pm
Author: MG77B
Subject: streuth
In reply to: D9 's message, "I don't take well to riddles RB...........(Long)" on 27/07/06 4:35:03pm

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[> [> It was a personal opinion D9,No teams were mentioned -- RB, 27/07/06 8:36:22pm [1]

the gist of the post can be summed up by the heading:

"Curbing competitive spirit to the extent: SL 1st, Team 2nd is the key (to this comp)"

The point of post can be summed up as: A mandate of good sportsmanship overcomes the need for the countless rules in a comp like this.

Your reply indicates perhaps you missed the point completely so "no comment" is my response.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> That was the problem, and perhaps...... -- D9, 27/07/06 10:18:48pm [1]

you missed that point. You can't have a stab, and not be particular. What do you want RB, half the comp question ing their actions "just in case" the comments you made refered to them. I am all for you bringing up an issue that you feel has arisen, then we put it to the moderators to decide what is and isn't for the best of the comp. Is this a hard concept.

Why do you want to deal with issues like this. Ask me why I was playing the Kangaroos and not the Swans RB, ask me why Jacko is posting under my IP address, bring up a change after the dealine, bring up dodgies trading, bring up dodgy team maintenence, WHY WHY WHY do you choose to harbour these thoughts and then come out in riddle talk to half bring it up, not naming any names.

Do what you want RB, I will do the ladder if you don't want to do it any longer. I would never have someone do something that they don't wish to do. We all had individual jobs to do, we had a way of bringing issues up. Comment or don't comment, just let us know what you were doing, and what you don't want to do.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> Give it a rest,Just for clarifaction -- RB, 27/07/06 11:23:12pm [1]

the use of the word dodgy had nothing with the SL team Dodgies.

Once again you missed the point completely.

The End:

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> That was a typo. Sorry Rizzo, RB..... -- D9, 28/07/06 10:50:09am [1]

Why don't you want to simply deal with the issues at hand. Why do I feel you were on the attack, then when I bit, you retreat into the darkeness with no clarification apart from "you missed the point". What was the point RB. You claim there is some serious goings on in our competition, and highlight 'what' is happening, but don't say 'who' is doing it. That suggests to me that you are having a direct dig at me, and the Magpies team dealings. If true, I can take that on board, we can get into the nitty gritty of it, and if you and/or other coaches think that my dealings have been less than 'Respect gaining' from my fellow coach, and you outline how, I will appologise. It leaves us in an awful predicament if you half accuse and then cease any clarification.

Whats wrong RB, come straight out and say what you think, and we can deal with it. Simple honest and open, for all to discuss.

Can you see the point in harbouring these thoughts? Can you see that this comp will be enjoyable for you if those thoughts are in your head? Issues you have, I want to deal with, I can't see that we have at this stage.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> [> IMO D9 you are over reacting to the post. -- Josh, 28/07/06 5:17:17pm [1]

IMO the gist of the post by RB is correct. We have a number of basic rules (ie naming your best team, trying to pick to position etc) and if everyone follows these the comp works better for it.

I am not sure if there is history in relation to your response, however on face value I certainly did not read it as an attack on any particular person or team.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> And I quote..... -- D9, 28/07/06 5:36:37pm [1]

"Unfortunately however sometimes white line fever kicks in. Draw changes mid season, fielding unbalanced teams, dodgy trading, trading between teams posting from the same ip address, dodgy team selection, changing selection after the deadline, raiding the free agents list, maintaining poorly balanced squads etc"

Now your right to say that he isn't directing these comments at a particular team, but Josh, are your sure that he doesn't think you have dodgy team selection, or is it you who has been changing your side after the deadline, or even maintaining a poorly balanced side. Don't worry about the IP address one and Raiding the free agents list, they're mine, and the changing fixtures mid season is Maxwell and mines combined effort.

See I see it from two way, one as a coach that has been accused of a few things that doesn't maintain the respect of my fellow coaches, and two as a SL moderator, worried that the correct procedures to bringing new rules in, and the debate of issues is being overlooked.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]