[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement:
Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor
of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users'
privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your
privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket
to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we
also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.
Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your
contribution is not tax-deductible.)
PayPal Acct: 
Feedback: 
Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):
[ Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 18/05/06 11:28:06am
Author: SL
Subject: PROPOSED schedule for Draft/Trade period (comments please)
*It appears you cant have 1 without the other.
*Ideally a draft order would not be determined till end R13
but this is to late in the season.If we schedule a Mid Season Draft (every year) & determine the draft order end R9 then by "luck of the draw" sometimes teams will win & sometimes lose.Its a luck of the draw scenario but surely we can live with it?
(damn the Fockers get ripped this year lol)
DRAFT:
1/Draft order determined End R9
2/Delistings to be posted by Friday 26th May
3/Draft Starts Saturday 27th May & Finishes before Wednesday 31st May.(rip into it)
TRADES:
Trading Ends on Friday 26th May at Midnight
USING NEW PLAYERS
Players Drafted/Traded CANNOT be used until R10
[
Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message
]
Replies:
[>
Sounds good to me -- Shabby, 18/05/06 11:48:44am [1]
[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]
[>
No Draft -- Maxwell, 18/05/06 12:15:06pm [1]
I knew this was coming when I saw trades of 2 players for one. It was quite obvious.
A true indication of Draft order can not be made until the end of Round 13.
In my opinion a draft should be conducted in the off season.
1.National Draft
2.Pre-season Draft.
We have 44 players(or should have) on our lists.
The draft pool is very shallow.
Any draft after round 9 is not equal for all teams.
There is no equality.
If players have traded away players, they should have to continue the year with less numbers on their list. That is the choice they have made.
When I suggested trading, I did so because I felt Shabby should be given the opportunity to have some players of his own choice.
Drafting at this time is not on.
Maxwell
I speak for Libba as well.
[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]
[>
Happy either way -- Walt, 18/05/06 9:18:01pm [1]
The draft may help me, but I'm finding the list of 44 has meant I'm getting a 22 every week, which didn't happen last year.
The draft may help those who have long term injuries and any mid term retirees. It effectively becomes a trade because you swap your duds with a slightly better dud unless a rookie has been promoted (like Lovett and Tuck last year).
[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]
[>
My call:Decide between a R9 or R13 Draft/Trade period -- RB, 18/05/06 10:41:23pm [1]
Not both.
Why: it doubles the workload & i aint got the time.
Agree R13 is fairer but think its to late in the season.
Therefore i favour R9.
As long as the cream goes to the bottom teams from the free agents list i'm happy.
cheers RB
[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]
[> [>
How about we....... -- D9, 19/05/06 11:36:10am [1]
Get the number you finished last year, add the number you are at round 9, get these numbers and form another ladder. This give success or lack of last year, coupled with success at the beginning of this year. Lowest first highest last.
Don't worry I suprise myself sometimes ;)
[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]
[> [> [>
R9 Trade period -- Shabby, 19/05/06 12:02:50pm [1]
If theres only to be 1.
[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]
[> [> [> [>
Have we got the free agents list handy? -- MG77B, 19/05/06 12:46:17pm [1]
Has all 14 teams got a chance to improve their lists or is it just 3-4 good players in the mix
[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]
[> [>
My Opinion -- Maxwell, 19/05/06 1:37:33pm [1]
If we are to have this Draft at the end of Round 9, I suggest we keep the order of the teams at the conclusion of Round 9.
We should not consider how teams finished last year because some teams are either stronger or weaker.
Bombers, Bitchmond, Kangaroos are not as good as last year. Dodgies need a hand too.
On the otherhand Fockers,Cats, Aints and Swans have improved and do not need the same boost as do the sides that are struggling in 2006.
MG77B, I have penciled in about 7 players that would be really worth picking up. With Pick 13, I think I will probably give it a miss.
Libba will be involved with 1 pick only.
Maxwell
[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]
[> [> [>
Ok I'm happy to go with the order after R9 -- MG77B, 19/05/06 1:51:49pm [1]
I orginally was leaning to R13, but it is getting to late into the year for those players to make a difference in anyones rise from the depths of the Superleague Ladder.
Just use the standings at the end of r9 for the order of draft picks
[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]
[> [> [> [>
What the....... -- D9, 19/05/06 4:16:59pm [1]
Yes teams have rised and fell from last year, thats why I said to take both efforts into account. So say you finished 12th last year, now you are 7th your combined score is 19. Say someone has fell, say 7th last year, and have fallen to 12th, they too get 19, in that case, the team to of fallen gets a pick before the other 19.
[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]
