[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement:
Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor
of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users'
privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your
privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket
to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we
also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.
Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your
contribution is not tax-deductible.)
PayPal Acct: 
Feedback: 
Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):
[ Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 24/04/06 3:06:41pm
Author: RB
Subject: Cant see a prob with that
In reply to:
Shabby
's message, "Kangas" on 24/04/06 2:27:02pm
Tough job u want there Shabby but for the 4 reasons listed below reckon its a good outcome.
1/ Your a Kangaroo supporter
2/ The Dodgies (on paper) seem a better squad & should be easier to sell to a new coach.
3/ The current Kangas coach is constantly AWOL
Depends what the others think i spose.
[
Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message
]
Replies:
[> [>
I probably shouldn't say this but........... -- SL, 24/04/06 8:24:57pm [1]
If the name Kangaroos is available, you could simply change names, and keep the best squad. Why I shouldn't say that, is that it would be harder to get a coach for the poorer side, but it is an option I think. Put it this way, it has been done before.
[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]
[> [> [>
Re: I probably shouldn't say this but........... -- Shabby, 24/04/06 9:02:06pm [1]
Might sound weird, but I'd actually prefer to take the weaker squad. I reckon its more challenging and a good way to start in a game which has been going for a while.
[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]
[> [> [> [>
While on rebuilding -- Howie, 24/04/06 11:21:01pm [1]
Has there been thought put into priority picks. Now that they've been scrapped from the AFL, will they also be scrapped from here.
If it hasn't already been, it's probably something that should be set in stone before it becomes an issue.
Cheers
[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]
[> [> [> [> [>
Assumed we would follow the AFL & scrap priority picks -- RB, 25/04/06 11:22:25am [1]
[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]
[> [> [> [> [> [>
I wouldn't mind seeing us go out on a limb -- Howie, 25/04/06 11:39:31am [1]
Let's keep priority picks for those that win less than 25 per cent, but in awarding the PPs assign them to after the first round.
Therefore meaning, if you fall into the PP bracket, you would get picks 1 and 15, rather than 1 and 2.
Just a thought.
Go Pies, I'm pumped for this one...
[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]
