I probably shouldn't say this but........... -- SUPER-LEAGUE BOARD

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

6/05/26 7:35:31pm [ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, [6], 7, 8, 9 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 24/04/06 8:24:57pm
Author: SL
Subject: I probably shouldn't say this but...........
In reply to: RB 's message, "Cant see a prob with that" on 24/04/06 3:06:41pm

If the name Kangaroos is available, you could simply change names, and keep the best squad. Why I shouldn't say that, is that it would be harder to get a coach for the poorer side, but it is an option I think. Put it this way, it has been done before.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[> [> [> Re: I probably shouldn't say this but........... -- Shabby, 24/04/06 9:02:06pm [1]

Might sound weird, but I'd actually prefer to take the weaker squad. I reckon its more challenging and a good way to start in a game which has been going for a while.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> While on rebuilding -- Howie, 24/04/06 11:21:01pm [1]

Has there been thought put into priority picks. Now that they've been scrapped from the AFL, will they also be scrapped from here.
If it hasn't already been, it's probably something that should be set in stone before it becomes an issue.

Cheers

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> Assumed we would follow the AFL & scrap priority picks -- RB, 25/04/06 11:22:25am [1]

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> [> I wouldn't mind seeing us go out on a limb -- Howie, 25/04/06 11:39:31am [1]

Let's keep priority picks for those that win less than 25 per cent, but in awarding the PPs assign them to after the first round.
Therefore meaning, if you fall into the PP bracket, you would get picks 1 and 15, rather than 1 and 2.

Just a thought.

Go Pies, I'm pumped for this one...

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]