I could not agree more... -- King of the Hill Message Board

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 01:45:59 05/16/04 Sun
Author: Jimmy Swanson
Subject: I could not agree more...
In reply to: Twig-Boy 's message, "How much longer?" on 07:51:22 04/23/04 Fri

Yeah, I have no idea as to why the writers have not devoted any time whatsoever to Peggy's side of the family. Her side of the family has only been mentioned in passing and rare flashbacks, and it is time to shed some light on Peggy's problems with her mother, reveal whether or not Peggy had, or still has, a father, explain the deal with her brother, and so on and so forth. It would also add a little more depth to her character, because Peggy has not been given much to work with as of late.

I do think they should put Ladybird to sleep, but I am also thinking about who among the regular characters might get it next. Cotton is a safe bet, perhaps even Boomhauer (just like the way "South Park" killed off Kenny for an entire season).

I do not think it is a smart idea devoting a lot of time to Boomhauer. He is good as a supporting character, but he is like Kramer on "Seinfeld." The less you know, the better.

There is a lot to Bill that they could work with, starting with his divorce. Apparently, he may have been sexually abused by his father, so I do not want to delve into his childhood, but what brought him to Arlen and his rocky marriage are furtile ground for material.

Here is an idea: The writers should do a flashback episode dating back to the early- or mid-90s so they can show Bill during his marriage as well as a younger Hank and Peggy raising an infant Bobby. They could do a lot of other stuff with it, too, like revealing Dave Henson, the 500-pound shut-in who lived next to Hank and Peggy before Kahn and his family moved in.

Out.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

that is true, but FOX only cares about the stupid Paris Hilton -- big fan, 08:29:02 06/01/04 Tue
- Re: Yeah, yeah, yeah! -- Jimmy Swanson, 01:57:17 06/21/04 Mon