that is true, but FOX only cares about the stupid Paris Hilton -- King of the Hill Message Board

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 08:29:02 06/01/04 Tue
Author: big fan
Subject: that is true, but FOX only cares about the stupid Paris Hilton
In reply to: Jimmy Swanson 's message, "I could not agree more..." on 01:45:59 05/16/04 Sun

>Yeah, I have no idea as to why the writers have not
>devoted any time whatsoever to Peggy's side of the
>family. Her side of the family has only been
>mentioned in passing and rare flashbacks, and it is
>time to shed some light on Peggy's problems with her
>mother, reveal whether or not Peggy had, or still has,
>a father, explain the deal with her brother, and so on
>and so forth. It would also add a little more depth
>to her character, because Peggy has not been given
>much to work with as of late.
>
>I do think they should put Ladybird to sleep, but I am
>also thinking about who among the regular characters
>might get it next. Cotton is a safe bet, perhaps even
>Boomhauer (just like the way "South Park" killed off
>Kenny for an entire season).
>
>I do not think it is a smart idea devoting a lot of
>time to Boomhauer. He is good as a supporting
>character, but he is like Kramer on "Seinfeld." The
>less you know, the better.
>
>There is a lot to Bill that they could work with,
>starting with his divorce. Apparently, he may have
>been sexually abused by his father, so I do not want
>to delve into his childhood, but what brought him to
>Arlen and his rocky marriage are furtile ground for
>material.
>
>Here is an idea: The writers should do a flashback
>episode dating back to the early- or mid-90s so they
>can show Bill during his marriage as well as a younger
>Hank and Peggy raising an infant Bobby. They could do
>a lot of other stuff with it, too, like revealing Dave
>Henson, the 500-pound shut-in who lived next to Hank
>and Peggy before Kahn and his family moved in.
>
>Out.

Yeah, bud.:

That is so true. Another episode could be something along the lines of whatever happened to Dale's Dad, or a "what if" episode, such as what would've happened had Nancy not cheated on dale, and had a baby with him, would anyone wonder what it would look like? Another one would be who was the person Luanne lost her virginity to. What I would like to see is someone FINALLY giving Peggy the ego bashing she deserves, I hate Peggy hill. Or as far as Bobby, maybe it could be an episode similar to the one where this girl, Marie was it, where Bobby got rejected, wouldn't it be great, if Bobby had a crush on some movie star, or supermodel, only to find out she also had feelings for him? Wouldn't that be something?

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Re: Yeah, yeah, yeah! -- Jimmy Swanson, 01:57:17 06/21/04 Mon