Create a New Forum Admin Login Member Login Contribute to Voyager Search VoyForums Help Desk VoyForums Exchange VoyForums Directory/Categories VoyForums Homepage VoyForums News FAQ - Frequently Asked Questions

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, [2], 3 ]

Subject: Re: Hatter's Castle, hams, Susan's site, etc. Author: Cinephilia [ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ] Date Posted: 15:00:25 02/02/06 Thu In reply to: Tim 's message, "Re: Hatter's Castle, hams, Susan's site, etc." on 09:19:21 02/02/06 Thu I think it goes back to Ancient Greece! I'm sure actors would ham it up when they were acting in a comedy by Aristophanes. And often in tragedies too! [ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[> [> [> Subject: "Ham" by any other name Author: Susan [ Edit | View ] Date Posted: 02:16:59 02/13/06 Mon The tradition of conscious artificiality in an actor's performance (whatever term you give it--"ham," "style," or ... see below) definitely goes back at least to Shakespeare's day. According to "The Bedford Companion to Shakespeare" by Russ McDonald, the "convention of doubling [actors in smaller parts taking on more than one role], combined with the absence of scenery, the lack of artificial lighting in the amphitheaters, and the proximity of the audience, fostered what is known as the _presentational_, as opposed to the _representational_, style of performance. In presentational theater, the illusion of a fictional narrative is maintained at the same time that the audience is reminded that a fiction is being performed. In other words, there is no strict pretense that this is Hamlet striding the battlements at Elsinore; rather, the audience is conscious that they are watching Burbage playing Hamlet on the stage of the Globe. [This] can augment the spectators' pleasure ... by increasing the sense of virtuosity that any good actor brings to any single part." [ Post a Reply to This Message ]

[> [> [> [> Subject: Where have I seen that character before ... ? Author: Susan [ Edit | View ] Date Posted: 03:24:59 04/10/06 Mon I think I've finally found a clue as to why Dennis's character was changed so drastically from the book to the movie: I recently saw Emlyn in a 1940 film based on another A. J. Cronin novel, "The Stars Look Down," this one directed by Carol Reed (foreshadowing all that striking camera work in "Odd Man Out"). In it, Emlyn plays another sociopathic, manipulative, two-faced, social-climbing cad who sets a major catastrophe in motion, then disappears from the story. And I know where he went after that: Levenford, where he changed his name to Dennis. (Notice the character has no surname? Seems pretty suspicious to me.) It's as if Emlyn played the character so well in "The Stars Look Down," the screenwriters for "Hatter's Castle" wanted an encore and decided to replace the novel's Dennis with Joe Gowlan from the previous movie. (Now I wonder how closely the screen version of "The Stars Look Down" stuck to *that* novel!) And please no comments about its being due to Emlyn's limited range! (Not that he didn't relish playing dastardly villains.) Anybody who doesn't think he has range should see his brilliant but brief performance in "The Wreck of the Mary Deare" or especially his Emile Zola in "I Accuse!" It's another small role, but his reading of the letter that made the titular headline just blows me away every time I hear it. And how about the amiable veterinarian/amateur sleuth, Dr. Henderson, in "Another Man's Poison"? He also gave a staid and touchingly tragic performance in "Eye of the Devil"--in which, BTW, he played opposite Deborah Kerr for the third time. The other time being, of course, in Major Barbara. They do have scenes together, but the only time you see them onscreen at the same time is at a distance, during the scene where Bob hits her in the face. But in the interior Salvation Army scene, there are a couple of long close-ups of Emlyn giving her an oh-so-dreamy-eyed look from across the room. Anyway, that's just the tip of the iceberg, I'm sure, because I've barely seen half his movies. Yet! [ Post a Reply to This Message ]