VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, [8], 9 ]
Subject: Re: 不相信使徒信經的牧師


Author:
富豪
 		[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 01:10:46 07/31/04 Sat
In reply to: Liberal 's message, "不相信使徒信經的牧師" on 23:50:09 07/30/04 Fri
 首先，我們必須清晰：
"牧師是信上帝是天地的創造者，也相信使徒信經的內容"
這句子是否套套邏輯．

若是，句子的謂語應該在主語裡不辯自明．
(謂語:是信上帝是天地的創造者，也相信使徒信經的內容
主語：牧師)

因此，"不信上帝是天地的創造者，也不相信使徒信經的內容"是與牧師一詞有矛盾．
也因此，該人不能再是牧師．

這是我上次的回應．

今次，我首先認同人要誠實，但為何"珍惜真誠者的教會則不應純以教義定義教內外或是否勝任牧師的界線"？有一位學生真誠地指出校政的不是，作為專業的老師仍要教導及愛護佢，但能否因他是真誠的學生，老師便能不以校規為這學生定操行分？此外，該牧師及學生真誠的指控不一定是真相．

其次，教義不是唯一標準，Matching with doctrine is necessary but not sufficient，你所提的實際處境也就是其他考慮．

對，　耶穌教我要愛人如己，包括非信徒．但耶穌也沒有稱法利賽人為自己的門徒啊
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:
Subject Author Date
Re: 不相信使徒信經的牧師Liberal02:42:32 07/31/04 Sat

Post a message:
This forum requires an account to post.
[ Create Account ]
[ Login ]
[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT+8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.