Re: Update on Beaumon tHospital case -- The Fieger Forum

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, [4], 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

Subject:

Re: Update on Beaumon tHospital case

Author:
Merry Laughter

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 10/11/16 10:22am
In reply to: Chris 's message, "Re: Update on Beaumon tHospital case" on 04/14/05 5:46pm

It's true Nathan wasn't held by his mother Shelley Laporte, but that was because Shelley chose not to hold him. I worked for the company that provided medical equipment for Nathan. Nathan also received 24/7 private duty nursing care from the same company. One of the nurses refused to return to the home stating she was certain that Nathan's medical problems were due to Munchausen Syndrome by proxy. She stated when Nathan was 3 yrs old, he would disconnect his ventilator and 24 hour pulse oximeter,climb out of his crib, and run around his room. his mother requested numerous sets of lead wires every month for the oximeter because the lead wires were ruined every time Nathan self disconnected himself.The lead wires were connected to the oximeter at one end, and to one of his toes at the other end. She also stated that whenever Nathan did this, Shelley would punish him by removing his only sources of entertainment; his books and his TV. Nathan was never allowed to leave his room to play with his other quad brothers and sister, or to eat a meal with his family. If Nathan was developmentally disabled, It was because his mother kept him a prisoner in his own room. When he reached the age to attend pre-school and Kindergarten, Nathan was not allowed to go. So, Nathan Laporte really is developmentally disabled, not because of medical injuries, but by mental injuries inflicted by his mother.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Subject	Author	Date
Re: Update on Beaumon tHospital case	Merry Laughter	10/11/16 11:37am