Blow out so far -- Fairfield Stags Hoops Forum

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, [7], 8, 9, 10 ]

Replies:

[> FU needs to learn how to defend the 3 point shot -- Antman, 01:30:21pm 12/11/05 Sun, [1]

They still have not learned...

Georgetown 5-12 shooting 3s with 5 minutes left in the half.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]

[> [> Halftime Georgetown 39, Fairfield 20 -- Antman, 01:40:54pm 12/11/05 Sun, [1]

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> Stags Being Squashed 60-33 -- Frank F, 02:20:37pm 12/11/05 Sun, [1]

8 minutes left. This appears to be a game of men vs midgets.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> Re: Stags Squashed 76-51 -- Stagophle, 02:47:47pm 12/11/05 Sun, [1]

Well, I feared this one coming after that crushing loss to Loyola and the long bus ride to DC. These were some pretty tough circumstances. Georgetown is a team to be reckoned with. Problem today was that we just didn't have the tools to do any reckoning. Not much to take away from this one except perhaps some sightseeing and checking out the National Christmas Tree. Time to regroup and get ready for Fordham who will be riding a high after the win over Virginia!

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]

[> Georgetown 76, Fairfield 51 -- Antman, 02:42:48pm 12/11/05 Sun, [1]

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]

[> Re: Blow out so far -- cmaynstag, 06:25:17pm 12/11/05 Sun, [1]

WHAT THE HECK WAS TOT's STARTING LINEUP ALL ABOUT? HOW DID WE STAY WITH IOWA AND PROVIDENCE...GOOD EFFORT BY TTODD.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]

[> [> Re: Blow out so far -- Frank F, 06:54:00pm 12/11/05 Sun, [1]

We stayed with Iowa and Prov because we hads good efforts and they are both not very good teams. Have you followed their results since our games?

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]

[> Too Much Talent -- Stagman, 07:23:29pm 12/11/05 Sun, [1]

Hoyas were too big for us to handle. They went early to 7'2" Hibbert and the Stags couldn't handle him and the other big men inside. Middleton came in early and played alot, but he was not enough.

When the Stags sagged inside, the Hoyas fired up 3's. Usually that is not a bad thing, because G'town is not known for having good shooters. Today their shooters all looked like George Gervin though. I haven't seen the stats, but they must have had at least a dozen 3's and shot a good percentage because most of them were wide open.

Too much to ask the Stags to hang with these guys.

I hope they can regroup for the MAAC season and hope that Maxwell and Diakhite can add a little toughness up front. Our guards are solid, but with no offensive threats up front, they are an awfully easy team to figure out.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]

[> [> How 'bout Too Little Talent -- Frank F, 07:28:47pm 12/11/05 Sun, [1]

I guess the other side of the coin is 'too little talent' for Fairfield?

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> Re: How 'bout Too Little Talent -- Stagman, 07:49:41pm 12/11/05 Sun, [1]

Frank,

Did you expect them to hang with G'town? If so, you're delusional.

Yes, the team needs more size and athleticism. That's true of most mid-majors, especially those in the MAAC.

Rather than lament the fact, how about focusing on the possibility that this team might be okay in the MAAC? No reason to believe they can't compete with most of the MAAC teams.

I saw exactly what I expected today at the MCI Center. I also saw nothing that made me think that these guys can't compete for the top tier of the MAAC. Outside of Iona and Manhattan, who else is appreciably better than the Stags? If they can get some size for next year, I think the program will be in pretty good shape.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> Re: How 'bout Too Little Talent -- Frank F, 07:59:34pm 12/11/05 Sun, [1]

This is a 1-6 team, maybe headed for 1-10.

Maybe thats good enough for you, but I'
ll tell you something - people are not going to pay $12/$18 to watch this kind of basketball. Its a disgrace.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]

[> [> Re: Too Much Talent -- cmaynstag, 12:55:50am 12/12/05 Mon, [1]

I am with Frank F. I was with Maryland and Hoya alumni and felt second class in terms of our team and other issues.

1.)Our ticket office cannot handle ticket processing and negotiate a group price. The turnout was average at best for this game. Very embarrassing overall.

2.) Our students are fickle about attending games, which means we're going to lose any chance of AHY being a tough place to play. What chance do we have of being a Creighton, Holy Cross, Bucknell, etc.????

3.)Coching, Tactics, Gameplan and Lineups of TOT remain suspect...are we on the downswing with him running the show?
Time to think about how to compete in the world of D1 athletics and not just be a small-time regional program.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]

[> Re: Blow out so far -- Bridgeport, 08:08:56pm 12/11/05 Sun, [1]

Frank
you are negative all the time--
what was your previous name on the board ?
and the name before that ?
everone is allowed to post, and be negative, but why do you change your name ?
were you previously banned from this site ?

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]

[> [> Re: Blow out so far -- Frank F, 08:15:41pm 12/11/05 Sun, [1]

Were you previously banned from this site? Its hard to be negative when a team is 1-6. The record speaks for itself, doesn't it?

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> Hey Bridgeport -- Frank, 08:16:45pm 12/11/05 Sun, [1]

Why don't you tell us about all the positives that are happening with this basketball team. I'm prefectly willing to listen.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]