Date Posted:09:17:00 01/29/08 Tue Author: Janelle Subject: Re: Reading History In reply to:
Erin Risch
's message, "Reading History" on 06:29:56 01/28/08 Mon
I agree with your point Erin. I also made the connection between the levels of reading Dr. Jackson talked about and how Girard or anyone should read de Machaut. I think the difference you point out between how we are cautious of historical writers and how we trust literary narrators is a good and interesting point to address. I think perhaps it has something to do with the nature of the genre. When we read a historical text we understand the narrator's perception to be different from our own because of the difference in place and time. We understand history to be a collection fo facts and events that, as we learn more and more about them, are, through time, revised and changed. I think this is why our reading of literature differs from our reading of history. In a novel, it does not necessarily occur to the reader that what is about to be presented to them is to be interepeted in the same way. The reader sees it as a story, not history, which is viewed with hindisght, which may lead to initial trust in a narrator.
