the truth is....?? -- 九濟堂

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Apr 26 2026, 1:30:10, Sun

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: [1], 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 ]

Subject: the truth is....??

Author:
Johnny

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 23:12:16 06/20/05 Mon
In reply to: 龍格保 's message, "玩出火la" on 10:22:01 06/19/05 Sun

Many form four students claim that the newspaper exaggerates. Can somebody explain to me that what was did they exaggerate and what was the truth?

Firstly, I think the game itself has no problem. The main point is that the student being “corn” should be fine with the game. He should agree to do so! Otherwise, it is not a game but a VERY SERIOUS SCHOOL BULLYING CASE!!

By the way, I also agree that the parents have no responsibility to defend our school reputation. What they do, can be purely due to revenge, take revenge to the students and school. It is surely destructive, but not to them but the SCHOOL! In their opinion, what other students did to their son is also TOTALLY DESTRUTIVE. Actually they can even charge the students! So I think telling the newspaper, no matter to SUN or MingPao, it is a mercy. We can only blame those students who have gone too far.
In my opinion, the best punishment would be the MINIMUM punishment that would clam the parents as they take an active role in this case. In this way, our school can try the best to maintain the FORGIVING POLICY and defend our reputation at the same time. So I think our school should have prevented the case from disclosing to the public, in the 50th anniversary.

To repeat my main point, playing is not a problem. But there should be a base line that is all students involved should agree to play and ensure there wouldn’t be any physical danger to them.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[> Subject: Re: 玩出火la

Author:
@@
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 01:56:02 06/21/05 Tue

去完旅行返黎就見到發生左d咁既野...睇完之後真係有d心up...

我97年升F1 04年F7畢業, o係sfxc讀左咁多年, 今次事件係點我唔清楚, 但係有d野我接觸左7年...相信唔會o係依1年時間內有180度既轉變吧?!

SFXC一向都係希望同學自律, 所以我地既校規比其他學校少好多繁文縟節. 另外, 可能其他學校[中/小學]比依d小功/小過好似食生菜咁易, 做成家長認為即使犯事學生被人記一個小過都只不過是小事一樁...但係我想講, o係SFXC無論你想拎小功/小過都有佢既難度..

今次事件會唔會係因為家長認為一個小過[o係佢心目中]係過於輕既刑罰, 用佢自己既尺度來看應該要比大過呢?? 而當佢向學校投訊應該加皇刑罰時[如有], 學校認為已經足夠而又再冇向依位家長解釋刑罰既準則呢? 如果係咁既話, 佢搞大件事依個行為又可以理解wor... 因為跟本就冇得講既..口同鼻"au"....