校規 -- 九濟堂

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Apr 26 2026, 1:29:52, Sun

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, [4], 5, 6, 7, 8 ]

Subject: 校規

Author:
oldboy

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 18:13:51 02/26/05 Sat

遲出門口是不應該．但公道點，既然校規是八點十分後當遲到，校方就應該八點十分後開始計．一係就改例八點零九分後當遲到.唔應該派人出來釋法至~~打第二下鐘便拉閘鎖人．只有中國式的市井文化（例如１８樓C座老周茶餐廳）先會這樣釋法:（我隻錶是剛踏正５點半了，現在冇下午茶優惠．因為解釋權在我老周手上.)
錄自2003年商台的<1８樓C座>.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[> Subject: Re: 校規(2)

Author:
oldboy
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 18:15:44 02/26/05 Sat

對不起，濟記是人治的,至於有人說受影響者活該兼唔見有成千人遲到.我希望他明白只有少數人受影響不等於這種做法是對.容許我回憶一下當年23條事件,按閣下邏輯,即使立了法也只有個別小數"臭口組"中招啦,又為何7,1這麼多港人上街反對?

Britain Foreign Minister Bill Rammell : The devils are in the details and explanations!