Re: ECON (MICRO) -- 九濟堂

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

May 18 2024, 20:58:13, Sat

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, [7], 8 ]

Subject: Re: ECON (MICRO)

Author:
econ低手

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 23:12:26 10/03/04 Sun
In reply to: 鐘意ECON既人 's message, "ECON (MICRO)" on 22:54:26 10/03/04 Sun

>又有另一條問題,
>A 100
>B 80
>C 50
>假設你CHOOSE了A
>咁CHOOSE A既 COST是B.
>點解 CHOOSE A既COST係B?

in econ concept
cost=opportunity cost=highest valued option forgone
我諗你既問題係問點解付出去得到a既cost唔計落opp cost, for e.g, 買a要$100, 點解呢$100唔計落opp cost度.
因為在你的假設裡, if u don't buy a, u will choose to buy b, 咁即係話, 你果$100, 就算唔買a, 你都唔會儲起佢, 而係去買b, 咁樣你果$100係唔係都要洗左佢, 咁你果$100咪唔會係你既opp cost

以上只是我的愚見, 不一定對....

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[> [> Subject: Re: ECON (MICRO)
Author: Oldyof7A [ Edit \| View ]	Date Posted: 21:28:13 10/04/04 Mon That $100 is the least valued option. Other options are higher valued than the $100. So the $100 is not the cost.